Comparing symbolic and substantive implementation of international standards – the case of ISO 14001 certification

Mesbahuddin Chowdhury, Daniel Prajogo, Jayanth Jayaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares the effects of substantive implementation and symbolic implementation of the ISO 14001 standard on benefits realised for firms and their satisfaction with the certification. Specifically, we examine whether top management commitment is a precursor to both modes of implementation styles. Also, we compare firms’ benefits–environmental, economic and marketing–emanating from these two modes of implementation and whether they affect the satisfaction levels of firms with ISO 14001 certification. We test the research framework of this study using a dataset that was drawn from 328 firms in Australia and New Zealand. Our findings showed that top management commitment plays an important role as a driver for both symbolic and substantive forms of ISO 14001 implementation. Substantive implementation has wider and stronger effects on the benefits of ISO 14001 adoption than symbolic implementation. Finally, both economic and marketing benefits have a positive effect on the level of satisfaction while environmental benefit, surprisingly, does not.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-361
Number of pages23
JournalAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • benefits
  • ISO 14001 certification
  • satisfaction
  • substantive implementation
  • symbolic implementation

Cite this

@article{b740d53c174248b68f95ee587eab36c1,
title = "Comparing symbolic and substantive implementation of international standards – the case of ISO 14001 certification",
abstract = "This study compares the effects of substantive implementation and symbolic implementation of the ISO 14001 standard on benefits realised for firms and their satisfaction with the certification. Specifically, we examine whether top management commitment is a precursor to both modes of implementation styles. Also, we compare firms’ benefits–environmental, economic and marketing–emanating from these two modes of implementation and whether they affect the satisfaction levels of firms with ISO 14001 certification. We test the research framework of this study using a dataset that was drawn from 328 firms in Australia and New Zealand. Our findings showed that top management commitment plays an important role as a driver for both symbolic and substantive forms of ISO 14001 implementation. Substantive implementation has wider and stronger effects on the benefits of ISO 14001 adoption than symbolic implementation. Finally, both economic and marketing benefits have a positive effect on the level of satisfaction while environmental benefit, surprisingly, does not.",
keywords = "benefits, ISO 14001 certification, satisfaction, substantive implementation, symbolic implementation",
author = "Mesbahuddin Chowdhury and Daniel Prajogo and Jayanth Jayaram",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14486563.2018.1451402",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "339--361",
journal = "Australasian Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "1448-6563",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Comparing symbolic and substantive implementation of international standards – the case of ISO 14001 certification. / Chowdhury, Mesbahuddin; Prajogo, Daniel; Jayaram, Jayanth.

In: Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, 03.07.2018, p. 339-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing symbolic and substantive implementation of international standards – the case of ISO 14001 certification

AU - Chowdhury, Mesbahuddin

AU - Prajogo, Daniel

AU - Jayaram, Jayanth

PY - 2018/7/3

Y1 - 2018/7/3

N2 - This study compares the effects of substantive implementation and symbolic implementation of the ISO 14001 standard on benefits realised for firms and their satisfaction with the certification. Specifically, we examine whether top management commitment is a precursor to both modes of implementation styles. Also, we compare firms’ benefits–environmental, economic and marketing–emanating from these two modes of implementation and whether they affect the satisfaction levels of firms with ISO 14001 certification. We test the research framework of this study using a dataset that was drawn from 328 firms in Australia and New Zealand. Our findings showed that top management commitment plays an important role as a driver for both symbolic and substantive forms of ISO 14001 implementation. Substantive implementation has wider and stronger effects on the benefits of ISO 14001 adoption than symbolic implementation. Finally, both economic and marketing benefits have a positive effect on the level of satisfaction while environmental benefit, surprisingly, does not.

AB - This study compares the effects of substantive implementation and symbolic implementation of the ISO 14001 standard on benefits realised for firms and their satisfaction with the certification. Specifically, we examine whether top management commitment is a precursor to both modes of implementation styles. Also, we compare firms’ benefits–environmental, economic and marketing–emanating from these two modes of implementation and whether they affect the satisfaction levels of firms with ISO 14001 certification. We test the research framework of this study using a dataset that was drawn from 328 firms in Australia and New Zealand. Our findings showed that top management commitment plays an important role as a driver for both symbolic and substantive forms of ISO 14001 implementation. Substantive implementation has wider and stronger effects on the benefits of ISO 14001 adoption than symbolic implementation. Finally, both economic and marketing benefits have a positive effect on the level of satisfaction while environmental benefit, surprisingly, does not.

KW - benefits

KW - ISO 14001 certification

KW - satisfaction

KW - substantive implementation

KW - symbolic implementation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045625256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14486563.2018.1451402

DO - 10.1080/14486563.2018.1451402

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 339

EP - 361

JO - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 1448-6563

IS - 3

ER -