Comparing rural and regional migration patterns of Australian medical general practitioners with other professions

Implications for rural workforce strategies

Dean Carson, Katherine Punshon, Matthew McGrail, Rebecca Kippen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The shortage of professional workers in rural and regional Australia continues as a major policy challenge. There has been substantially more strategy investment for the medical general practitioner (GP) profession than for other professions, particularly at the start of their careers.

Aims: To examine differences between domestic migration patterns of GPs and other professionals to rural and regional zones in Australia for younger, mid-life and older workers.

Data and methods: Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2011 Census were used to examine five-year migration rates for professionals in five ABS occupational classifications: generalist medical practitioners (GPs); engineering professionals; legal professionals; education professionals; and other health professionals. Migration volumes were benchmarked for GPs and compared both for other professions and career stage.

Results: GPs were less likely than other professionals to migrate from major urban to rural zones, regional to rural zones, or rural to regional zones. Younger GPs had the highest rural migration rates, while mid-life and older GPs were least likely to migrate to rural and regional zones. In contrast, increasingly age was associated positively with migration to rural zones for those in the other four professions.

Conclusions: Despite concerted policy efforts to encourage more GPs to move to rural areas, overall rural migration rates for GPs are lower than for other professionals, especially for older workers. Further investigation of the links between GP migration patterns and workforce policies needs to be undertaken to inform the application or otherwise of workforce strategies used by other professions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-68
Number of pages14
JournalAustralian Population Studies
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 19 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • professional migration
  • medical general practitioners (GPs)
  • counter-urbanisation
  • rural
  • regional
  • workforce
  • gravity model

Cite this

@article{57716db18bdd43fa86e690c4f68e6022,
title = "Comparing rural and regional migration patterns of Australian medical general practitioners with other professions: Implications for rural workforce strategies",
abstract = "Background: The shortage of professional workers in rural and regional Australia continues as a major policy challenge. There has been substantially more strategy investment for the medical general practitioner (GP) profession than for other professions, particularly at the start of their careers.Aims: To examine differences between domestic migration patterns of GPs and other professionals to rural and regional zones in Australia for younger, mid-life and older workers.Data and methods: Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2011 Census were used to examine five-year migration rates for professionals in five ABS occupational classifications: generalist medical practitioners (GPs); engineering professionals; legal professionals; education professionals; and other health professionals. Migration volumes were benchmarked for GPs and compared both for other professions and career stage.Results: GPs were less likely than other professionals to migrate from major urban to rural zones, regional to rural zones, or rural to regional zones. Younger GPs had the highest rural migration rates, while mid-life and older GPs were least likely to migrate to rural and regional zones. In contrast, increasingly age was associated positively with migration to rural zones for those in the other four professions.Conclusions: Despite concerted policy efforts to encourage more GPs to move to rural areas, overall rural migration rates for GPs are lower than for other professionals, especially for older workers. Further investigation of the links between GP migration patterns and workforce policies needs to be undertaken to inform the application or otherwise of workforce strategies used by other professions.",
keywords = "professional migration, medical general practitioners (GPs), counter-urbanisation, rural, regional, workforce, gravity model",
author = "Dean Carson and Katherine Punshon and Matthew McGrail and Rebecca Kippen",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "19",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "55--68",
journal = "Australian Population Studies",
issn = "2208-8482",
publisher = "Northern Institute",
number = "1",

}

Comparing rural and regional migration patterns of Australian medical general practitioners with other professions : Implications for rural workforce strategies. / Carson, Dean; Punshon, Katherine; McGrail, Matthew; Kippen, Rebecca.

In: Australian Population Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 19.11.2017, p. 55-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing rural and regional migration patterns of Australian medical general practitioners with other professions

T2 - Implications for rural workforce strategies

AU - Carson, Dean

AU - Punshon, Katherine

AU - McGrail, Matthew

AU - Kippen, Rebecca

PY - 2017/11/19

Y1 - 2017/11/19

N2 - Background: The shortage of professional workers in rural and regional Australia continues as a major policy challenge. There has been substantially more strategy investment for the medical general practitioner (GP) profession than for other professions, particularly at the start of their careers.Aims: To examine differences between domestic migration patterns of GPs and other professionals to rural and regional zones in Australia for younger, mid-life and older workers.Data and methods: Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2011 Census were used to examine five-year migration rates for professionals in five ABS occupational classifications: generalist medical practitioners (GPs); engineering professionals; legal professionals; education professionals; and other health professionals. Migration volumes were benchmarked for GPs and compared both for other professions and career stage.Results: GPs were less likely than other professionals to migrate from major urban to rural zones, regional to rural zones, or rural to regional zones. Younger GPs had the highest rural migration rates, while mid-life and older GPs were least likely to migrate to rural and regional zones. In contrast, increasingly age was associated positively with migration to rural zones for those in the other four professions.Conclusions: Despite concerted policy efforts to encourage more GPs to move to rural areas, overall rural migration rates for GPs are lower than for other professionals, especially for older workers. Further investigation of the links between GP migration patterns and workforce policies needs to be undertaken to inform the application or otherwise of workforce strategies used by other professions.

AB - Background: The shortage of professional workers in rural and regional Australia continues as a major policy challenge. There has been substantially more strategy investment for the medical general practitioner (GP) profession than for other professions, particularly at the start of their careers.Aims: To examine differences between domestic migration patterns of GPs and other professionals to rural and regional zones in Australia for younger, mid-life and older workers.Data and methods: Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2011 Census were used to examine five-year migration rates for professionals in five ABS occupational classifications: generalist medical practitioners (GPs); engineering professionals; legal professionals; education professionals; and other health professionals. Migration volumes were benchmarked for GPs and compared both for other professions and career stage.Results: GPs were less likely than other professionals to migrate from major urban to rural zones, regional to rural zones, or rural to regional zones. Younger GPs had the highest rural migration rates, while mid-life and older GPs were least likely to migrate to rural and regional zones. In contrast, increasingly age was associated positively with migration to rural zones for those in the other four professions.Conclusions: Despite concerted policy efforts to encourage more GPs to move to rural areas, overall rural migration rates for GPs are lower than for other professionals, especially for older workers. Further investigation of the links between GP migration patterns and workforce policies needs to be undertaken to inform the application or otherwise of workforce strategies used by other professions.

KW - professional migration

KW - medical general practitioners (GPs)

KW - counter-urbanisation

KW - rural

KW - regional

KW - workforce

KW - gravity model

UR - http://www.australianpopulationstudies.org/index.php/aps/article/view/12

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 55

EP - 68

JO - Australian Population Studies

JF - Australian Population Studies

SN - 2208-8482

IS - 1

ER -