Comparing calibration approaches for 3D ultrasound probes

Christoph Bergmeir, M. Seitel, C Frank, R. De Simone, H. P. Meinzer, Ivo Wolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: By adding a tracking sensor to a 3D ultrasound (US) probe and thus locating the probe in space, new applications within the fields of image guided surgery and radiation therapy are possible. To locate the US volume in space, a calibration is necessary to determine the mathematical transformation for mapping points from the tracking coordinate system to the US image coordinate system. We present a comprehensive comparison of two different approaches to perform this calibration for 3D US. Methods: For both approaches a phantom is scanned and located in the images by means of segmentation and registration techniques. Calibration is then performed by either relating the tracked phantom's (TP) spatial location to the calibration scans, or by solely correlating scans taken from multiple perspectives when using hand - eye calibration methods (HE). Depending on which approach is utilized, a minimum of one or three images, respectively, need to be acquired for the calibration process. Results: We evaluated both approaches for calibration and reconstruction precision. Regarding the latter, the performed tests led to mean target localization errors of 3.5 mm (HE) and 3.3 mm (TP) for real data, and of 1.4 mm (HE) and 0.9 mm (TP) for simulated data. Conclusion: Our results indicate that taking additional scans leads to a significant improvement in the calibration. Furthermore, the obtained calibration and reconstruction precisions suggest the use of a TP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-213
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Bergmeir, Christoph ; Seitel, M. ; Frank, C ; De Simone, R. ; Meinzer, H. P. ; Wolf, Ivo. / Comparing calibration approaches for 3D ultrasound probes. In: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 203-213.
@article{df9737499071413aba3434e076493111,
title = "Comparing calibration approaches for 3D ultrasound probes",
abstract = "Objective: By adding a tracking sensor to a 3D ultrasound (US) probe and thus locating the probe in space, new applications within the fields of image guided surgery and radiation therapy are possible. To locate the US volume in space, a calibration is necessary to determine the mathematical transformation for mapping points from the tracking coordinate system to the US image coordinate system. We present a comprehensive comparison of two different approaches to perform this calibration for 3D US. Methods: For both approaches a phantom is scanned and located in the images by means of segmentation and registration techniques. Calibration is then performed by either relating the tracked phantom's (TP) spatial location to the calibration scans, or by solely correlating scans taken from multiple perspectives when using hand - eye calibration methods (HE). Depending on which approach is utilized, a minimum of one or three images, respectively, need to be acquired for the calibration process. Results: We evaluated both approaches for calibration and reconstruction precision. Regarding the latter, the performed tests led to mean target localization errors of 3.5 mm (HE) and 3.3 mm (TP) for real data, and of 1.4 mm (HE) and 0.9 mm (TP) for simulated data. Conclusion: Our results indicate that taking additional scans leads to a significant improvement in the calibration. Furthermore, the obtained calibration and reconstruction precisions suggest the use of a TP.",
author = "Christoph Bergmeir and M. Seitel and C Frank and {De Simone}, R. and Meinzer, {H. P.} and Ivo Wolf",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11548-008-0258-x",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "203--213",
journal = "International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery",
issn = "1861-6410",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Comparing calibration approaches for 3D ultrasound probes. / Bergmeir, Christoph; Seitel, M.; Frank, C; De Simone, R.; Meinzer, H. P.; Wolf, Ivo.

In: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Vol. 4, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 203-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing calibration approaches for 3D ultrasound probes

AU - Bergmeir, Christoph

AU - Seitel, M.

AU - Frank, C

AU - De Simone, R.

AU - Meinzer, H. P.

AU - Wolf, Ivo

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Objective: By adding a tracking sensor to a 3D ultrasound (US) probe and thus locating the probe in space, new applications within the fields of image guided surgery and radiation therapy are possible. To locate the US volume in space, a calibration is necessary to determine the mathematical transformation for mapping points from the tracking coordinate system to the US image coordinate system. We present a comprehensive comparison of two different approaches to perform this calibration for 3D US. Methods: For both approaches a phantom is scanned and located in the images by means of segmentation and registration techniques. Calibration is then performed by either relating the tracked phantom's (TP) spatial location to the calibration scans, or by solely correlating scans taken from multiple perspectives when using hand - eye calibration methods (HE). Depending on which approach is utilized, a minimum of one or three images, respectively, need to be acquired for the calibration process. Results: We evaluated both approaches for calibration and reconstruction precision. Regarding the latter, the performed tests led to mean target localization errors of 3.5 mm (HE) and 3.3 mm (TP) for real data, and of 1.4 mm (HE) and 0.9 mm (TP) for simulated data. Conclusion: Our results indicate that taking additional scans leads to a significant improvement in the calibration. Furthermore, the obtained calibration and reconstruction precisions suggest the use of a TP.

AB - Objective: By adding a tracking sensor to a 3D ultrasound (US) probe and thus locating the probe in space, new applications within the fields of image guided surgery and radiation therapy are possible. To locate the US volume in space, a calibration is necessary to determine the mathematical transformation for mapping points from the tracking coordinate system to the US image coordinate system. We present a comprehensive comparison of two different approaches to perform this calibration for 3D US. Methods: For both approaches a phantom is scanned and located in the images by means of segmentation and registration techniques. Calibration is then performed by either relating the tracked phantom's (TP) spatial location to the calibration scans, or by solely correlating scans taken from multiple perspectives when using hand - eye calibration methods (HE). Depending on which approach is utilized, a minimum of one or three images, respectively, need to be acquired for the calibration process. Results: We evaluated both approaches for calibration and reconstruction precision. Regarding the latter, the performed tests led to mean target localization errors of 3.5 mm (HE) and 3.3 mm (TP) for real data, and of 1.4 mm (HE) and 0.9 mm (TP) for simulated data. Conclusion: Our results indicate that taking additional scans leads to a significant improvement in the calibration. Furthermore, the obtained calibration and reconstruction precisions suggest the use of a TP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349228466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11548-008-0258-x

DO - 10.1007/s11548-008-0258-x

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 203

EP - 213

JO - International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

JF - International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

SN - 1861-6410

IS - 2

ER -