Comparing Australian garment and childcare homeworkers’ experience of regulation and representation

Annie Delaney, Yee Fui Ng, Vidhula Venugopal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Labour markets in Australia have long been segmented by gender and race. This study compares two highly gendered and racially segmented labour markets, home-based family day care workers and garment homeworkers. The comparative cases examine the broader trends of migration, production and consumption that reinforce gender and racial stereotypes, and discourses that underpin representations that women workers are ideally suited to such work. We theorise the gender and racialised inequalities of homework based on the literature on invisibilisation and social reproduction to explore the vulnerable position of migrant women and the consequences of having limited options, such as legal and social protections and any capacity to collectively organise. Our analysis examines the roles and responses of institutions and conceptualises the socio-political factors that affect the characterisation of homework as non-work or as self-employed entrepreneurial activities. By mapping the differing regulatory trajectories of these two groups of homeworkers in terms of regulation and representation, we find both similarities and differences. While garment homeworkers have achieved recognition through legislation and social mobilisation, their circumstances leave them less likely to access such rights. By contrast, the failure to recognise family day care homeworkers, has left them to market forces. JEL code: J01

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346-364
Number of pages19
JournalThe Economic and Labour Relations Review
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • family day care workers
  • garment homework
  • gender
  • Homework
  • migration

Cite this

@article{62d69b7315664ee096ead4c3061553d9,
title = "Comparing Australian garment and childcare homeworkers’ experience of regulation and representation",
abstract = "Labour markets in Australia have long been segmented by gender and race. This study compares two highly gendered and racially segmented labour markets, home-based family day care workers and garment homeworkers. The comparative cases examine the broader trends of migration, production and consumption that reinforce gender and racial stereotypes, and discourses that underpin representations that women workers are ideally suited to such work. We theorise the gender and racialised inequalities of homework based on the literature on invisibilisation and social reproduction to explore the vulnerable position of migrant women and the consequences of having limited options, such as legal and social protections and any capacity to collectively organise. Our analysis examines the roles and responses of institutions and conceptualises the socio-political factors that affect the characterisation of homework as non-work or as self-employed entrepreneurial activities. By mapping the differing regulatory trajectories of these two groups of homeworkers in terms of regulation and representation, we find both similarities and differences. While garment homeworkers have achieved recognition through legislation and social mobilisation, their circumstances leave them less likely to access such rights. By contrast, the failure to recognise family day care homeworkers, has left them to market forces. JEL code: J01",
keywords = "family day care workers, garment homework, gender, Homework, migration",
author = "Annie Delaney and Ng, {Yee Fui} and Vidhula Venugopal",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1035304618781661",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "346--364",
journal = "The Economic and Labour Relations Review",
issn = "1035-3046",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Comparing Australian garment and childcare homeworkers’ experience of regulation and representation. / Delaney, Annie; Ng, Yee Fui; Venugopal, Vidhula.

In: The Economic and Labour Relations Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 346-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Australian garment and childcare homeworkers’ experience of regulation and representation

AU - Delaney, Annie

AU - Ng, Yee Fui

AU - Venugopal, Vidhula

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Labour markets in Australia have long been segmented by gender and race. This study compares two highly gendered and racially segmented labour markets, home-based family day care workers and garment homeworkers. The comparative cases examine the broader trends of migration, production and consumption that reinforce gender and racial stereotypes, and discourses that underpin representations that women workers are ideally suited to such work. We theorise the gender and racialised inequalities of homework based on the literature on invisibilisation and social reproduction to explore the vulnerable position of migrant women and the consequences of having limited options, such as legal and social protections and any capacity to collectively organise. Our analysis examines the roles and responses of institutions and conceptualises the socio-political factors that affect the characterisation of homework as non-work or as self-employed entrepreneurial activities. By mapping the differing regulatory trajectories of these two groups of homeworkers in terms of regulation and representation, we find both similarities and differences. While garment homeworkers have achieved recognition through legislation and social mobilisation, their circumstances leave them less likely to access such rights. By contrast, the failure to recognise family day care homeworkers, has left them to market forces. JEL code: J01

AB - Labour markets in Australia have long been segmented by gender and race. This study compares two highly gendered and racially segmented labour markets, home-based family day care workers and garment homeworkers. The comparative cases examine the broader trends of migration, production and consumption that reinforce gender and racial stereotypes, and discourses that underpin representations that women workers are ideally suited to such work. We theorise the gender and racialised inequalities of homework based on the literature on invisibilisation and social reproduction to explore the vulnerable position of migrant women and the consequences of having limited options, such as legal and social protections and any capacity to collectively organise. Our analysis examines the roles and responses of institutions and conceptualises the socio-political factors that affect the characterisation of homework as non-work or as self-employed entrepreneurial activities. By mapping the differing regulatory trajectories of these two groups of homeworkers in terms of regulation and representation, we find both similarities and differences. While garment homeworkers have achieved recognition through legislation and social mobilisation, their circumstances leave them less likely to access such rights. By contrast, the failure to recognise family day care homeworkers, has left them to market forces. JEL code: J01

KW - family day care workers

KW - garment homework

KW - gender

KW - Homework

KW - migration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048767390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1035304618781661

DO - 10.1177/1035304618781661

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 346

EP - 364

JO - The Economic and Labour Relations Review

JF - The Economic and Labour Relations Review

SN - 1035-3046

IS - 3

ER -