Abstract
Why are females, compared with males, both more likely to have strong STEM-related performance and less likely to enter a STEM field later on? We exploit random classroom assignment to identify the impact of comparative STEM advantage on specialization decisions. Comparative STEM advantage is proxied by the within-classroom ranking of the ratio of STEM over non-STEM performance. We find that females with a higher comparative STEM advantage are more likely to choose a STEM school track and apply for a STEM degree. Comparative STEM advantage explains 12 percent of the underrepresentation of qualified females in the earliest instance of STEM specialization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1937-1980 |
| Number of pages | 44 |
| Journal | The Journal of Human Resources |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- gender gap
- STEM
- random peer effects
- ordinal rank
- absolute advantage
- comparative advantage
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver