Abstract
Why are females, compared with males, both more likely to have strong STEM-related performance and less likely to enter a STEM field later on? We exploit random classroom assignment to identify the impact of comparative STEM advantage on specialization decisions. Comparative STEM advantage is proxied by the within-classroom ranking of the ratio of STEM over non-STEM performance. We find that females with a higher comparative STEM advantage are more likely to choose a STEM school track and apply for a STEM degree. Comparative STEM advantage explains 12 percent of the underrepresentation of qualified females in the earliest instance of STEM specialization.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1937-1980 |
Number of pages | 44 |
Journal | Journal of Human Resources |
Volume | 59 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- gender gap
- STEM
- random peer effects
- ordinal rank
- absolute advantage
- comparative advantage