Abstract
In order to provide an effective whistle-blowing system, it is expected that companies would provide employees with a high level of disclosure regarding the whistle-blowing process. This study investigates variation in the extent of whistle-blowing disclosures. As a measure of whistle-blowing implementation, this study further examines the provision of a hotline channel. The results suggest that the extent of whistle-blowing disclosures is positively associated with the permissibility of anonymous reporting and organisational support for whistle-blowing, the number of external directors on the audit committee, and the existence of concentrated shareholdings. The mere existence of whistle-blowing disclosures could simply be symbolic. The findings also indicate a greater likelihood of the provision of hotlines when companies are larger in size, have a higher level of current inventory, are cross-listed in the US, and permit anonymous reporting.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 283-295 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Business Ethics |
Volume | 114 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Fraud
- Hotlines
- Internal reporting
- Whistle-blowing
- Whistle-blowing policies