Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development

Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection

Md Kamruzzaman, Farjana Mostafiz Shatu, Julian Hine, Gavin Turrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research identifies the commuting mode choice behaviour of 3537 adults living in different types of transit oriented development (TOD) in Brisbane by disentangling the effects of their "evil twin" transit adjacent developments (TADs), and by also controlling for residential self-selection, travel attitudes and preferences, and socio-demographic effects. A TwoStep cluster analysis was conducted to identify the natural groupings of respondents' living environment based on six built environment indicators. The analysis resulted in five types of neighbourhoods: urban TODs, activity centre TODs, potential TODs, TADs, and traditional suburbs. HABITAT survey data were used to derive the commute mode choice behaviour of people living in these neighbourhoods. In addition, statements reflecting both respondents' travel attitudes and living preferences were also collected as part of the survey. Factor analyses were conducted based on these statements and these derived factors were then used to control for residential self-selection. Four binary logistic regression models were estimated, one for each of the travel modes used (e.g. public transport, active transport, less sustainable transport such as the car/taxi, and other), to differentiate between the commuting behaviour of people living in the five types of neighbourhoods. The findings verify that urban TODs enhance the use of public transport and reduce car usage. No significant difference was found in the commuting behaviour between respondents living in traditional suburbs and TADs. The results confirm the hypothesis that TADs are the "evil twin" of TODs. The data indicates that TADs and the mode choices of residents in these neighbourhoods is a missed transport policy opportunity. Further policy efforts are required for a successive transition of TADs into TODs in order to realise the full benefits of these. TOD policy should also be integrated with context specific TOD design principles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-196
Number of pages10
JournalTransport Policy
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Commuting Behaviour
  • Living Preferences
  • Transit Adjacent Development
  • Transit Oriented Development
  • Travel Attitudes and Preferences

Cite this

@article{84937f5b703d45a39c93371349a89e57,
title = "Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development: Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection",
abstract = "This research identifies the commuting mode choice behaviour of 3537 adults living in different types of transit oriented development (TOD) in Brisbane by disentangling the effects of their {"}evil twin{"} transit adjacent developments (TADs), and by also controlling for residential self-selection, travel attitudes and preferences, and socio-demographic effects. A TwoStep cluster analysis was conducted to identify the natural groupings of respondents' living environment based on six built environment indicators. The analysis resulted in five types of neighbourhoods: urban TODs, activity centre TODs, potential TODs, TADs, and traditional suburbs. HABITAT survey data were used to derive the commute mode choice behaviour of people living in these neighbourhoods. In addition, statements reflecting both respondents' travel attitudes and living preferences were also collected as part of the survey. Factor analyses were conducted based on these statements and these derived factors were then used to control for residential self-selection. Four binary logistic regression models were estimated, one for each of the travel modes used (e.g. public transport, active transport, less sustainable transport such as the car/taxi, and other), to differentiate between the commuting behaviour of people living in the five types of neighbourhoods. The findings verify that urban TODs enhance the use of public transport and reduce car usage. No significant difference was found in the commuting behaviour between respondents living in traditional suburbs and TADs. The results confirm the hypothesis that TADs are the {"}evil twin{"} of TODs. The data indicates that TADs and the mode choices of residents in these neighbourhoods is a missed transport policy opportunity. Further policy efforts are required for a successive transition of TADs into TODs in order to realise the full benefits of these. TOD policy should also be integrated with context specific TOD design principles.",
keywords = "Commuting Behaviour, Living Preferences, Transit Adjacent Development, Transit Oriented Development, Travel Attitudes and Preferences",
author = "Md Kamruzzaman and Shatu, {Farjana Mostafiz} and Julian Hine and Gavin Turrell",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.003",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "187--196",
journal = "Transport Policy",
issn = "0967-070X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development : Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection. / Kamruzzaman, Md; Shatu, Farjana Mostafiz; Hine, Julian; Turrell, Gavin.

In: Transport Policy, Vol. 42, 2015, p. 187-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development

T2 - Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection

AU - Kamruzzaman, Md

AU - Shatu, Farjana Mostafiz

AU - Hine, Julian

AU - Turrell, Gavin

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This research identifies the commuting mode choice behaviour of 3537 adults living in different types of transit oriented development (TOD) in Brisbane by disentangling the effects of their "evil twin" transit adjacent developments (TADs), and by also controlling for residential self-selection, travel attitudes and preferences, and socio-demographic effects. A TwoStep cluster analysis was conducted to identify the natural groupings of respondents' living environment based on six built environment indicators. The analysis resulted in five types of neighbourhoods: urban TODs, activity centre TODs, potential TODs, TADs, and traditional suburbs. HABITAT survey data were used to derive the commute mode choice behaviour of people living in these neighbourhoods. In addition, statements reflecting both respondents' travel attitudes and living preferences were also collected as part of the survey. Factor analyses were conducted based on these statements and these derived factors were then used to control for residential self-selection. Four binary logistic regression models were estimated, one for each of the travel modes used (e.g. public transport, active transport, less sustainable transport such as the car/taxi, and other), to differentiate between the commuting behaviour of people living in the five types of neighbourhoods. The findings verify that urban TODs enhance the use of public transport and reduce car usage. No significant difference was found in the commuting behaviour between respondents living in traditional suburbs and TADs. The results confirm the hypothesis that TADs are the "evil twin" of TODs. The data indicates that TADs and the mode choices of residents in these neighbourhoods is a missed transport policy opportunity. Further policy efforts are required for a successive transition of TADs into TODs in order to realise the full benefits of these. TOD policy should also be integrated with context specific TOD design principles.

AB - This research identifies the commuting mode choice behaviour of 3537 adults living in different types of transit oriented development (TOD) in Brisbane by disentangling the effects of their "evil twin" transit adjacent developments (TADs), and by also controlling for residential self-selection, travel attitudes and preferences, and socio-demographic effects. A TwoStep cluster analysis was conducted to identify the natural groupings of respondents' living environment based on six built environment indicators. The analysis resulted in five types of neighbourhoods: urban TODs, activity centre TODs, potential TODs, TADs, and traditional suburbs. HABITAT survey data were used to derive the commute mode choice behaviour of people living in these neighbourhoods. In addition, statements reflecting both respondents' travel attitudes and living preferences were also collected as part of the survey. Factor analyses were conducted based on these statements and these derived factors were then used to control for residential self-selection. Four binary logistic regression models were estimated, one for each of the travel modes used (e.g. public transport, active transport, less sustainable transport such as the car/taxi, and other), to differentiate between the commuting behaviour of people living in the five types of neighbourhoods. The findings verify that urban TODs enhance the use of public transport and reduce car usage. No significant difference was found in the commuting behaviour between respondents living in traditional suburbs and TADs. The results confirm the hypothesis that TADs are the "evil twin" of TODs. The data indicates that TADs and the mode choices of residents in these neighbourhoods is a missed transport policy opportunity. Further policy efforts are required for a successive transition of TADs into TODs in order to realise the full benefits of these. TOD policy should also be integrated with context specific TOD design principles.

KW - Commuting Behaviour

KW - Living Preferences

KW - Transit Adjacent Development

KW - Transit Oriented Development

KW - Travel Attitudes and Preferences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933501639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.003

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 187

EP - 196

JO - Transport Policy

JF - Transport Policy

SN - 0967-070X

ER -