Community as a spray-on solution

a case study of community engagement within the income management programme in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Community development theorists Bryson and Mowbray (1981) argue that community is often used as motherhood term to mask the imposition of conservative agendas within social programs. Their theory is applied here to critically analyse the introduction of paternalistic income management (welfare quarantining) programs in Australia that overwhelmingly limit the personal agency and choices of participants. Particular attention is drawn to the limited consultation processes used by government to justify the imposition of these programs on specific communities despite their top-down nature, and the resistance provoked within these communities. Some alternative processes based on genuine community development principles are proposed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-227
Number of pages18
JournalCommunity Development
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Cite this

@article{9c70575d6fc54e43907057afa0f68f2f,
title = "Community as a spray-on solution: a case study of community engagement within the income management programme in Australia",
abstract = "Community development theorists Bryson and Mowbray (1981) argue that community is often used as motherhood term to mask the imposition of conservative agendas within social programs. Their theory is applied here to critically analyse the introduction of paternalistic income management (welfare quarantining) programs in Australia that overwhelmingly limit the personal agency and choices of participants. Particular attention is drawn to the limited consultation processes used by government to justify the imposition of these programs on specific communities despite their top-down nature, and the resistance provoked within these communities. Some alternative processes based on genuine community development principles are proposed.",
author = "Philip Mendes",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/cdj/bsx008",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "210--227",
journal = "Community Development",
issn = "1557-5330",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Community as a spray-on solution : a case study of community engagement within the income management programme in Australia. / Mendes, Philip.

In: Community Development, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 210-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community as a spray-on solution

T2 - a case study of community engagement within the income management programme in Australia

AU - Mendes, Philip

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Community development theorists Bryson and Mowbray (1981) argue that community is often used as motherhood term to mask the imposition of conservative agendas within social programs. Their theory is applied here to critically analyse the introduction of paternalistic income management (welfare quarantining) programs in Australia that overwhelmingly limit the personal agency and choices of participants. Particular attention is drawn to the limited consultation processes used by government to justify the imposition of these programs on specific communities despite their top-down nature, and the resistance provoked within these communities. Some alternative processes based on genuine community development principles are proposed.

AB - Community development theorists Bryson and Mowbray (1981) argue that community is often used as motherhood term to mask the imposition of conservative agendas within social programs. Their theory is applied here to critically analyse the introduction of paternalistic income management (welfare quarantining) programs in Australia that overwhelmingly limit the personal agency and choices of participants. Particular attention is drawn to the limited consultation processes used by government to justify the imposition of these programs on specific communities despite their top-down nature, and the resistance provoked within these communities. Some alternative processes based on genuine community development principles are proposed.

U2 - 10.1093/cdj/bsx008

DO - 10.1093/cdj/bsx008

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 210

EP - 227

JO - Community Development

JF - Community Development

SN - 1557-5330

IS - 2

ER -