Communities of practice to improve public health outcomes

a systematic review

Liza Barbour, Rebecca Armstrong, Patrick Condron, Claire Palermo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Communities of practice (CoPs) exist to enable people to share knowledge, innovate and progress a common field of practice. This paper aims to identify whether CoPs have a measured impact on public health practice and the tools used to measure the impact and potential barriers and facilitators that may have been identified during the implementation of these CoPs. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Searches of six databases, Google Scholar and a citation search were completed. Included studies were from 1986 to 2016, involved the public health workforce and an evaluation of a CoP -like intervention. A narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted. Findings: From 3,021 publications, 12 studies met inclusion criteria and described the impact of ten CoPs amongst public health practitioners from America, Canada, Australasia and the United Kingdom. CoPs support the prevention workforce to change their practice when they provide structured problem-solving, reflective practice and networking opportunities. None of the studies described the impact of CoPs on public health outcomes. Practical implications: CoPs that provide structured problem-solving, reflective practice and diverse networking may effectively support the public health workforce. Existing methods used to evaluate CoPs lack rigour; thus, the true impact of CoPs on population health remains unknown. Originality/value: This is the first known systematic review that has measured the impact of CoPs on the preventative health workforce and the conditions in which they have an impact.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-343
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Knowledge Management
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Capacity building
  • Knowledge translation
  • Public health
  • Workforce

Cite this

@article{5b2a9f7d53c849ee973d91ca73cf22ef,
title = "Communities of practice to improve public health outcomes: a systematic review",
abstract = "Purpose: Communities of practice (CoPs) exist to enable people to share knowledge, innovate and progress a common field of practice. This paper aims to identify whether CoPs have a measured impact on public health practice and the tools used to measure the impact and potential barriers and facilitators that may have been identified during the implementation of these CoPs. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Searches of six databases, Google Scholar and a citation search were completed. Included studies were from 1986 to 2016, involved the public health workforce and an evaluation of a CoP -like intervention. A narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted. Findings: From 3,021 publications, 12 studies met inclusion criteria and described the impact of ten CoPs amongst public health practitioners from America, Canada, Australasia and the United Kingdom. CoPs support the prevention workforce to change their practice when they provide structured problem-solving, reflective practice and networking opportunities. None of the studies described the impact of CoPs on public health outcomes. Practical implications: CoPs that provide structured problem-solving, reflective practice and diverse networking may effectively support the public health workforce. Existing methods used to evaluate CoPs lack rigour; thus, the true impact of CoPs on population health remains unknown. Originality/value: This is the first known systematic review that has measured the impact of CoPs on the preventative health workforce and the conditions in which they have an impact.",
keywords = "Capacity building, Knowledge translation, Public health, Workforce",
author = "Liza Barbour and Rebecca Armstrong and Patrick Condron and Claire Palermo",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0111",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "326--343",
journal = "Journal of Knowledge Management",
issn = "1367-3270",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "2",

}

Communities of practice to improve public health outcomes : a systematic review. / Barbour, Liza; Armstrong, Rebecca; Condron, Patrick; Palermo, Claire.

In: Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2018, p. 326-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communities of practice to improve public health outcomes

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Barbour, Liza

AU - Armstrong, Rebecca

AU - Condron, Patrick

AU - Palermo, Claire

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Purpose: Communities of practice (CoPs) exist to enable people to share knowledge, innovate and progress a common field of practice. This paper aims to identify whether CoPs have a measured impact on public health practice and the tools used to measure the impact and potential barriers and facilitators that may have been identified during the implementation of these CoPs. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Searches of six databases, Google Scholar and a citation search were completed. Included studies were from 1986 to 2016, involved the public health workforce and an evaluation of a CoP -like intervention. A narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted. Findings: From 3,021 publications, 12 studies met inclusion criteria and described the impact of ten CoPs amongst public health practitioners from America, Canada, Australasia and the United Kingdom. CoPs support the prevention workforce to change their practice when they provide structured problem-solving, reflective practice and networking opportunities. None of the studies described the impact of CoPs on public health outcomes. Practical implications: CoPs that provide structured problem-solving, reflective practice and diverse networking may effectively support the public health workforce. Existing methods used to evaluate CoPs lack rigour; thus, the true impact of CoPs on population health remains unknown. Originality/value: This is the first known systematic review that has measured the impact of CoPs on the preventative health workforce and the conditions in which they have an impact.

AB - Purpose: Communities of practice (CoPs) exist to enable people to share knowledge, innovate and progress a common field of practice. This paper aims to identify whether CoPs have a measured impact on public health practice and the tools used to measure the impact and potential barriers and facilitators that may have been identified during the implementation of these CoPs. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Searches of six databases, Google Scholar and a citation search were completed. Included studies were from 1986 to 2016, involved the public health workforce and an evaluation of a CoP -like intervention. A narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted. Findings: From 3,021 publications, 12 studies met inclusion criteria and described the impact of ten CoPs amongst public health practitioners from America, Canada, Australasia and the United Kingdom. CoPs support the prevention workforce to change their practice when they provide structured problem-solving, reflective practice and networking opportunities. None of the studies described the impact of CoPs on public health outcomes. Practical implications: CoPs that provide structured problem-solving, reflective practice and diverse networking may effectively support the public health workforce. Existing methods used to evaluate CoPs lack rigour; thus, the true impact of CoPs on population health remains unknown. Originality/value: This is the first known systematic review that has measured the impact of CoPs on the preventative health workforce and the conditions in which they have an impact.

KW - Capacity building

KW - Knowledge translation

KW - Public health

KW - Workforce

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043483396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0111

DO - 10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0111

M3 - Review Article

VL - 22

SP - 326

EP - 343

JO - Journal of Knowledge Management

JF - Journal of Knowledge Management

SN - 1367-3270

IS - 2

ER -