Communication failure across the perioperative pathway: Implications for person-centered healthcare

Sandra Braaf, Elizabeth Manias, Sue Finch, Robin Riley, Fiona Munro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were systematically to examine communication patterns across the perioperative pathway, to investigate factors associated with communication failure and to examine the consequences of communication failure and its implications for person-centered healthcare. Methods: Structured observations were made of healthcare professionals to record specific attributes of communication and identify communication failure across the perioperative pathway, comprising pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative domains in 3 Australian public hospitals. Generalised linear mixed models with communication failure as a binary outcome were fitted. First, using single explanatory variables and second with combinations of explanatory variables. Results: Over 90 hours, 3,021 communication events and 328 individuals were observed. The odds of communication failure when overlapping communication occurred were over 4 times higher than when it did not (odds ratio (OR) = 4.05, 95% CI: 1.81 to 9.19, p <0.001). For post-anaesthetic care nurses, the odds of failure were 2.6 times greater when multitasking than when not (OR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.76 to 3.85, p<0.001). In contrast, the odds of failure were lower for theatre staff when multitasking than when not (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.98, p = 0.042). Of the healthcare professionals followed, the odds of failure for nurses, surgeons and coordinators were 3 to 4 times higher than the odds of failure for the anaesthetist. The 3 most frequent consequences of communication failure were increased communication interactions, missing information in communication and increased workload. Conclusions: Communication failure occurs regularly within the perioperative environment. Particular attributes of communication events were associated with communication failure and multiple visible consequences across the perioperative pathway. These findings have direct implications for the person-centeredness of clinical services.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)696 - 706
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Person Centered Medicine
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Communication
  • communication failure
  • healthcare quality
  • perioperative
  • person-centered healthcare

Cite this

Braaf, Sandra ; Manias, Elizabeth ; Finch, Sue ; Riley, Robin ; Munro, Fiona. / Communication failure across the perioperative pathway : Implications for person-centered healthcare. In: International Journal of Person Centered Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 696 - 706.
@article{c889418cdf2f4fb1b2c8a1180878a477,
title = "Communication failure across the perioperative pathway: Implications for person-centered healthcare",
abstract = "Objectives: The objectives of this study were systematically to examine communication patterns across the perioperative pathway, to investigate factors associated with communication failure and to examine the consequences of communication failure and its implications for person-centered healthcare. Methods: Structured observations were made of healthcare professionals to record specific attributes of communication and identify communication failure across the perioperative pathway, comprising pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative domains in 3 Australian public hospitals. Generalised linear mixed models with communication failure as a binary outcome were fitted. First, using single explanatory variables and second with combinations of explanatory variables. Results: Over 90 hours, 3,021 communication events and 328 individuals were observed. The odds of communication failure when overlapping communication occurred were over 4 times higher than when it did not (odds ratio (OR) = 4.05, 95{\%} CI: 1.81 to 9.19, p <0.001). For post-anaesthetic care nurses, the odds of failure were 2.6 times greater when multitasking than when not (OR = 2.61, 95{\%} CI: 1.76 to 3.85, p<0.001). In contrast, the odds of failure were lower for theatre staff when multitasking than when not (OR = 0.60, 95{\%} CI: 0.36 to 0.98, p = 0.042). Of the healthcare professionals followed, the odds of failure for nurses, surgeons and coordinators were 3 to 4 times higher than the odds of failure for the anaesthetist. The 3 most frequent consequences of communication failure were increased communication interactions, missing information in communication and increased workload. Conclusions: Communication failure occurs regularly within the perioperative environment. Particular attributes of communication events were associated with communication failure and multiple visible consequences across the perioperative pathway. These findings have direct implications for the person-centeredness of clinical services.",
keywords = "Communication, communication failure, healthcare quality, perioperative, person-centered healthcare",
author = "Sandra Braaf and Elizabeth Manias and Sue Finch and Robin Riley and Fiona Munro",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.5750/ijpcm.v2i4.296",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "696 -- 706",
journal = "International Journal of Person Centered Medicine",
issn = "2043-7749",
number = "4",

}

Communication failure across the perioperative pathway : Implications for person-centered healthcare. / Braaf, Sandra; Manias, Elizabeth; Finch, Sue; Riley, Robin; Munro, Fiona.

In: International Journal of Person Centered Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2012, p. 696 - 706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication failure across the perioperative pathway

T2 - Implications for person-centered healthcare

AU - Braaf, Sandra

AU - Manias, Elizabeth

AU - Finch, Sue

AU - Riley, Robin

AU - Munro, Fiona

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objectives: The objectives of this study were systematically to examine communication patterns across the perioperative pathway, to investigate factors associated with communication failure and to examine the consequences of communication failure and its implications for person-centered healthcare. Methods: Structured observations were made of healthcare professionals to record specific attributes of communication and identify communication failure across the perioperative pathway, comprising pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative domains in 3 Australian public hospitals. Generalised linear mixed models with communication failure as a binary outcome were fitted. First, using single explanatory variables and second with combinations of explanatory variables. Results: Over 90 hours, 3,021 communication events and 328 individuals were observed. The odds of communication failure when overlapping communication occurred were over 4 times higher than when it did not (odds ratio (OR) = 4.05, 95% CI: 1.81 to 9.19, p <0.001). For post-anaesthetic care nurses, the odds of failure were 2.6 times greater when multitasking than when not (OR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.76 to 3.85, p<0.001). In contrast, the odds of failure were lower for theatre staff when multitasking than when not (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.98, p = 0.042). Of the healthcare professionals followed, the odds of failure for nurses, surgeons and coordinators were 3 to 4 times higher than the odds of failure for the anaesthetist. The 3 most frequent consequences of communication failure were increased communication interactions, missing information in communication and increased workload. Conclusions: Communication failure occurs regularly within the perioperative environment. Particular attributes of communication events were associated with communication failure and multiple visible consequences across the perioperative pathway. These findings have direct implications for the person-centeredness of clinical services.

AB - Objectives: The objectives of this study were systematically to examine communication patterns across the perioperative pathway, to investigate factors associated with communication failure and to examine the consequences of communication failure and its implications for person-centered healthcare. Methods: Structured observations were made of healthcare professionals to record specific attributes of communication and identify communication failure across the perioperative pathway, comprising pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative domains in 3 Australian public hospitals. Generalised linear mixed models with communication failure as a binary outcome were fitted. First, using single explanatory variables and second with combinations of explanatory variables. Results: Over 90 hours, 3,021 communication events and 328 individuals were observed. The odds of communication failure when overlapping communication occurred were over 4 times higher than when it did not (odds ratio (OR) = 4.05, 95% CI: 1.81 to 9.19, p <0.001). For post-anaesthetic care nurses, the odds of failure were 2.6 times greater when multitasking than when not (OR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.76 to 3.85, p<0.001). In contrast, the odds of failure were lower for theatre staff when multitasking than when not (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.98, p = 0.042). Of the healthcare professionals followed, the odds of failure for nurses, surgeons and coordinators were 3 to 4 times higher than the odds of failure for the anaesthetist. The 3 most frequent consequences of communication failure were increased communication interactions, missing information in communication and increased workload. Conclusions: Communication failure occurs regularly within the perioperative environment. Particular attributes of communication events were associated with communication failure and multiple visible consequences across the perioperative pathway. These findings have direct implications for the person-centeredness of clinical services.

KW - Communication

KW - communication failure

KW - healthcare quality

KW - perioperative

KW - person-centered healthcare

UR - http://www.ijpcm.org/index.php/IJPCM/article/view/296

U2 - 10.5750/ijpcm.v2i4.296

DO - 10.5750/ijpcm.v2i4.296

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 696

EP - 706

JO - International Journal of Person Centered Medicine

JF - International Journal of Person Centered Medicine

SN - 2043-7749

IS - 4

ER -