Communication-based interventions for increasing influenza vaccination rates among Aboriginal children: A randomised controlled trial

Kim Borg, Kim Sutton, Megan Beasley, Fraser Tull, Nicholas Faulkner, Justin Halliday, Cameron Knott, Peter Bragge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: In Australia, the influenza vaccine is funded for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter referred to as Aboriginal) children aged 6 months to <5 years old. In Victoria, only 2% of Aboriginal children are vaccinated against influenza. Objective: To evaluate whether sending a letter or sending a pamphlet directly to parents/guardians would improve influenza vaccine uptake amongst Aboriginal identified children. Design: The study involved a multi-arm, parallel, randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups and one control group. Participants & setting: Participants included parents or guardians of Victorian children (aged 6 months to <5 years) who identified as Aboriginal. Households (n = 5534) were randomised (using a random number generator) to receive either a personalised letter (n = 1845), a pamphlet (n = 1845), or no direct communication (control) (n = 1844). The letter and the pamphlet were designed using the INSPIRE framework – a set of behaviour change techniques for action-oriented communication. Main outcome measure: The proportion of households where all eligible children received the influenza vaccine between 2 May 2017 and 1 September 2017. Results: The control group's vaccination rate was 4.4%, higher than previous years. The pamphlet group achieved a similar vaccination rate (4.5%). The letter group's vaccination rate of 5.9% was significantly higher than the control group [χ2 (1, n = 3689) = 4.33, p =.037]. Conclusions: Sending a personalised letter directly to parents/guardians was an effective strategy for increasing influenza vaccination among Aboriginal children. The ineffectiveness of the pamphlet may be due to the lack of personalisation and the authority associated with the letter. Additional research is required to understand participant responses to the material. Trial registration: This research was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 13 September 2017 (ACTRN12617001315303).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6790-6795
Number of pages6
JournalVaccine
Volume36
Issue number45
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Aboriginal
  • Children
  • Influenza
  • Letter
  • Pamphlet
  • Vaccination

Cite this

@article{8517daaf35044d0d878cca7a03848b5b,
title = "Communication-based interventions for increasing influenza vaccination rates among Aboriginal children: A randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: In Australia, the influenza vaccine is funded for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter referred to as Aboriginal) children aged 6 months to <5 years old. In Victoria, only 2{\%} of Aboriginal children are vaccinated against influenza. Objective: To evaluate whether sending a letter or sending a pamphlet directly to parents/guardians would improve influenza vaccine uptake amongst Aboriginal identified children. Design: The study involved a multi-arm, parallel, randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups and one control group. Participants & setting: Participants included parents or guardians of Victorian children (aged 6 months to <5 years) who identified as Aboriginal. Households (n = 5534) were randomised (using a random number generator) to receive either a personalised letter (n = 1845), a pamphlet (n = 1845), or no direct communication (control) (n = 1844). The letter and the pamphlet were designed using the INSPIRE framework – a set of behaviour change techniques for action-oriented communication. Main outcome measure: The proportion of households where all eligible children received the influenza vaccine between 2 May 2017 and 1 September 2017. Results: The control group's vaccination rate was 4.4{\%}, higher than previous years. The pamphlet group achieved a similar vaccination rate (4.5{\%}). The letter group's vaccination rate of 5.9{\%} was significantly higher than the control group [χ2 (1, n = 3689) = 4.33, p =.037]. Conclusions: Sending a personalised letter directly to parents/guardians was an effective strategy for increasing influenza vaccination among Aboriginal children. The ineffectiveness of the pamphlet may be due to the lack of personalisation and the authority associated with the letter. Additional research is required to understand participant responses to the material. Trial registration: This research was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 13 September 2017 (ACTRN12617001315303).",
keywords = "Aboriginal, Children, Influenza, Letter, Pamphlet, Vaccination",
author = "Kim Borg and Kim Sutton and Megan Beasley and Fraser Tull and Nicholas Faulkner and Justin Halliday and Cameron Knott and Peter Bragge",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.020",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "6790--6795",
journal = "Vaccine",
issn = "0264-410X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "45",

}

Communication-based interventions for increasing influenza vaccination rates among Aboriginal children : A randomised controlled trial. / Borg, Kim; Sutton, Kim; Beasley, Megan; Tull, Fraser; Faulkner, Nicholas; Halliday, Justin; Knott, Cameron; Bragge, Peter.

In: Vaccine, Vol. 36, No. 45, 29.10.2018, p. 6790-6795.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication-based interventions for increasing influenza vaccination rates among Aboriginal children

T2 - A randomised controlled trial

AU - Borg, Kim

AU - Sutton, Kim

AU - Beasley, Megan

AU - Tull, Fraser

AU - Faulkner, Nicholas

AU - Halliday, Justin

AU - Knott, Cameron

AU - Bragge, Peter

PY - 2018/10/29

Y1 - 2018/10/29

N2 - Background: In Australia, the influenza vaccine is funded for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter referred to as Aboriginal) children aged 6 months to <5 years old. In Victoria, only 2% of Aboriginal children are vaccinated against influenza. Objective: To evaluate whether sending a letter or sending a pamphlet directly to parents/guardians would improve influenza vaccine uptake amongst Aboriginal identified children. Design: The study involved a multi-arm, parallel, randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups and one control group. Participants & setting: Participants included parents or guardians of Victorian children (aged 6 months to <5 years) who identified as Aboriginal. Households (n = 5534) were randomised (using a random number generator) to receive either a personalised letter (n = 1845), a pamphlet (n = 1845), or no direct communication (control) (n = 1844). The letter and the pamphlet were designed using the INSPIRE framework – a set of behaviour change techniques for action-oriented communication. Main outcome measure: The proportion of households where all eligible children received the influenza vaccine between 2 May 2017 and 1 September 2017. Results: The control group's vaccination rate was 4.4%, higher than previous years. The pamphlet group achieved a similar vaccination rate (4.5%). The letter group's vaccination rate of 5.9% was significantly higher than the control group [χ2 (1, n = 3689) = 4.33, p =.037]. Conclusions: Sending a personalised letter directly to parents/guardians was an effective strategy for increasing influenza vaccination among Aboriginal children. The ineffectiveness of the pamphlet may be due to the lack of personalisation and the authority associated with the letter. Additional research is required to understand participant responses to the material. Trial registration: This research was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 13 September 2017 (ACTRN12617001315303).

AB - Background: In Australia, the influenza vaccine is funded for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter referred to as Aboriginal) children aged 6 months to <5 years old. In Victoria, only 2% of Aboriginal children are vaccinated against influenza. Objective: To evaluate whether sending a letter or sending a pamphlet directly to parents/guardians would improve influenza vaccine uptake amongst Aboriginal identified children. Design: The study involved a multi-arm, parallel, randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups and one control group. Participants & setting: Participants included parents or guardians of Victorian children (aged 6 months to <5 years) who identified as Aboriginal. Households (n = 5534) were randomised (using a random number generator) to receive either a personalised letter (n = 1845), a pamphlet (n = 1845), or no direct communication (control) (n = 1844). The letter and the pamphlet were designed using the INSPIRE framework – a set of behaviour change techniques for action-oriented communication. Main outcome measure: The proportion of households where all eligible children received the influenza vaccine between 2 May 2017 and 1 September 2017. Results: The control group's vaccination rate was 4.4%, higher than previous years. The pamphlet group achieved a similar vaccination rate (4.5%). The letter group's vaccination rate of 5.9% was significantly higher than the control group [χ2 (1, n = 3689) = 4.33, p =.037]. Conclusions: Sending a personalised letter directly to parents/guardians was an effective strategy for increasing influenza vaccination among Aboriginal children. The ineffectiveness of the pamphlet may be due to the lack of personalisation and the authority associated with the letter. Additional research is required to understand participant responses to the material. Trial registration: This research was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 13 September 2017 (ACTRN12617001315303).

KW - Aboriginal

KW - Children

KW - Influenza

KW - Letter

KW - Pamphlet

KW - Vaccination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054082417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.020

DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.020

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 6790

EP - 6795

JO - Vaccine

JF - Vaccine

SN - 0264-410X

IS - 45

ER -