Comment–Reply Exchanges: Trends and Suggestions

Matthew Bunkers, John Allen, Walker Ashley, Stephen Bieda, Kristin Calhoun, Benjamin Kirtman, Karen Kosiba, Kelly Mahoney, Lynn McMurdie, Corey Potvin, Zhaoxia Pu, Elizabeth Ritchie

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialOtherpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this editorial is to 1) encourage authors to write American Meteorological Society (AMS) journal “comment” and “reply” (hereinafter Comment and Reply) article types and 2) provide guidance for the Comment and Reply process for AMS journals. A decline in Comment–Reply exchanges for Monthly Weather Review (MWR) and the Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (JAS) was noted by Errico (2000), and Schultz (2008) reported only seven Comments on MWR papers from 2003 to 2008 (despite >1000 AMS scientific papers being published during that time). A similar declining trend is noted herein for Weather and Forecasting (WAF).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-636
Number of pages4
JournalWeather and Forecasting
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2023

Cite this