Commentary on viewpoint

Using the same cut-off for sulfur hexafluoride and nitrogen multiplebreath washout may not be appropriate

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1514
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume119
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2015

Cite this

@article{93da271c43594a7db0e0c5e827bba0e0,
title = "Commentary on viewpoint: Using the same cut-off for sulfur hexafluoride and nitrogen multiplebreath washout may not be appropriate",
author = "Thompson, {Bruce R.} and K. Nilsen",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.00747.2015",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "1514",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "12",

}

Commentary on viewpoint : Using the same cut-off for sulfur hexafluoride and nitrogen multiplebreath washout may not be appropriate. / Thompson, Bruce R.; Nilsen, K.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 119, No. 12, 15.12.2015, p. 1514.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary on viewpoint

T2 - Using the same cut-off for sulfur hexafluoride and nitrogen multiplebreath washout may not be appropriate

AU - Thompson, Bruce R.

AU - Nilsen, K.

PY - 2015/12/15

Y1 - 2015/12/15

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957922637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00747.2015

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00747.2015

M3 - Letter

VL - 119

SP - 1514

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 12

ER -