TY - JOUR
T1 - Comment on 'A research participant's rights as an ethical dilemma'
AU - Komesaroff, Paul A.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - The Editorial by Jane, Davis and Bell poses the question of when in the course of a clinical trial, in which treatment allocations are blinded, information about such allocations should be released to research participants. The authors also ask whether there are circumstances in which an individual participant can demand that this information be provided. The questions are interesting because the different circumstances in which they may arise demonstrate different levels of ethical decision-making within the researcher-participant relationship.
AB - The Editorial by Jane, Davis and Bell poses the question of when in the course of a clinical trial, in which treatment allocations are blinded, information about such allocations should be released to research participants. The authors also ask whether there are circumstances in which an individual participant can demand that this information be provided. The questions are interesting because the different circumstances in which they may arise demonstrate different levels of ethical decision-making within the researcher-participant relationship.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871807303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00945.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00945.x
M3 - Comment / Debate
C2 - 23216481
AN - SCOPUS:84871807303
SN - 1326-0200
VL - 36
SP - 511
JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
IS - 6
ER -