TY - JOUR
T1 - Combining glomerular basement membrane and tubular basement membrane assessment improves the prediction of diabetic end-stage renal disease
AU - Zhao, Lijun
AU - Zhang, Junlin
AU - Lei, Song
AU - Ren, Honghong
AU - Zou, Yutong
AU - Bai, Lin
AU - Zhang, Rui
AU - Xu, Huan
AU - Li, Lin
AU - Zhao, Yuancheng
AU - Cooper, Mark E.
AU - Tong, Nanwei
AU - Zhang, Jie
AU - Liu, Fang
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background: To address the prognostic value of combining tubular basement membrane (TBM) and glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness in diabetic nephropathy (DN). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 110 patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven DN from 2011 to 2018. The pathological findings were confirmed according to the Renal Pathology Society classifications. GBM and TBM thicknesses were determined using the Haas' direct measurement/arithmetic mean method and orthogonal intercept method, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the hazard ratios (HRs) for the influence of combined GBM and TBM thickness for predicting end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Results: Patients were assigned to three groups according to the median GBM and TBM thickness: GBMloTBMlo (GBM < 681 nm and TBM < 1200 nm), GBMhiTBMlo/GBMloTBMhi (GBM ≥ 681 nm and TBM < 1200 nm, or GBM < 681 nm and TBM ≥ 1200 nm), and GBMhiTBMhi (GBM ≥ 681 nm and TBM ≥ 1200 nm). The GBMhiTBMlo/GBMloTBMhi and GBMhiTBMhi groups displayed poorer renal function, a more severe glomerular classification and interstitial inflammation, and poorer renal survival rates than the GBMloTBMlo group The GBMhiTBMlo/GBMloTBMhi and GBMhiTBMhi groups had adjusted HRs of 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-9.75) and 3.07 (95% CI, 2.87-12.78), respectively, compared with the GBMloTBMlo group. Conclusions: TBM thickness enhanced GBM thickness for renal prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.
AB - Background: To address the prognostic value of combining tubular basement membrane (TBM) and glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness in diabetic nephropathy (DN). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 110 patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven DN from 2011 to 2018. The pathological findings were confirmed according to the Renal Pathology Society classifications. GBM and TBM thicknesses were determined using the Haas' direct measurement/arithmetic mean method and orthogonal intercept method, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the hazard ratios (HRs) for the influence of combined GBM and TBM thickness for predicting end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Results: Patients were assigned to three groups according to the median GBM and TBM thickness: GBMloTBMlo (GBM < 681 nm and TBM < 1200 nm), GBMhiTBMlo/GBMloTBMhi (GBM ≥ 681 nm and TBM < 1200 nm, or GBM < 681 nm and TBM ≥ 1200 nm), and GBMhiTBMhi (GBM ≥ 681 nm and TBM ≥ 1200 nm). The GBMhiTBMlo/GBMloTBMhi and GBMhiTBMhi groups displayed poorer renal function, a more severe glomerular classification and interstitial inflammation, and poorer renal survival rates than the GBMloTBMlo group The GBMhiTBMlo/GBMloTBMhi and GBMhiTBMhi groups had adjusted HRs of 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-9.75) and 3.07 (95% CI, 2.87-12.78), respectively, compared with the GBMloTBMlo group. Conclusions: TBM thickness enhanced GBM thickness for renal prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.
KW - diabetic nephropathy
KW - end-stage renal disease
KW - glomerular membrane basement
KW - prognosis
KW - tubular membrane basement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099047107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1753-0407.13150
DO - 10.1111/1753-0407.13150
M3 - Article
C2 - 33352010
AN - SCOPUS:85099047107
SN - 1753-0393
VL - 13
SP - 572
EP - 584
JO - Journal of Diabetes
JF - Journal of Diabetes
IS - 7
ER -