TY - JOUR
T1 - Collins' core fine-tuning argument
AU - Saward, Mark Douglas
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Collins (The Blackwell companion to natural theology, 2009) presents an argument he calls the core fine-tuning argument . In this paper, I show that Collins argument is flawed in at least two ways. First, the structure, depending on likelihoods, fails to establish anything about the posterior probability of God s existence given fine-tuning. As an argument for God s existence, this is a serious failing. Second, his analysis of what is appropriately restricted background knowledge, combined with the credences of a specially chosen alien , do not allow him to establish the premise (Formula presented.).
AB - Collins (The Blackwell companion to natural theology, 2009) presents an argument he calls the core fine-tuning argument . In this paper, I show that Collins argument is flawed in at least two ways. First, the structure, depending on likelihoods, fails to establish anything about the posterior probability of God s existence given fine-tuning. As an argument for God s existence, this is a serious failing. Second, his analysis of what is appropriately restricted background knowledge, combined with the credences of a specially chosen alien , do not allow him to establish the premise (Formula presented.).
UR - http://goo.gl/PxYiJU
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84907065689
U2 - 10.1007/s11153-014-9453-6
DO - 10.1007/s11153-014-9453-6
M3 - Article
SN - 0020-7047
VL - 76
SP - 209
EP - 222
JO - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
JF - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
IS - 2
ER -