Collective efficacy as a task specific process: Examining the relationship between social ties, neighborhood cohesion and the capacity to respond to violence, delinquency and civic problems

Rebecca Wickes, John R. Hipp, Elise Sargeant, Ross Homel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In the neighborhood effects literature, collective efficacy is viewed as the key explanatory process associated with the spatial distribution of a range of social problems. While many studies usefully focus on the consequences of collective efficacy, in this paper we examine the task specificity of collective efficacy and consider the individual and neighborhood factors that influence residents' perceptions of neighborhood collective efficacy for specific tasks. Utilizing survey and administrative data from 4,093 residents nested in 148 communities in Australia, we distinguish collective efficacy for particular threats to social order and assess the relative importance of social cohesion and neighborhood social ties to the development of collective efficacy for violence, delinquency and civic/political issues. Our results indicate that a model separating collective efficacy for specific problems from social ties and the more generalized notions of social cohesion is necessary when understanding the regulation potential of neighborhoods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-127
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
Volume52
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Collective efficacy
  • Community
  • Social cohesion
  • Social ties

Cite this

@article{ec952b4786db469fac23c947f453ddc7,
title = "Collective efficacy as a task specific process: Examining the relationship between social ties, neighborhood cohesion and the capacity to respond to violence, delinquency and civic problems",
abstract = "In the neighborhood effects literature, collective efficacy is viewed as the key explanatory process associated with the spatial distribution of a range of social problems. While many studies usefully focus on the consequences of collective efficacy, in this paper we examine the task specificity of collective efficacy and consider the individual and neighborhood factors that influence residents' perceptions of neighborhood collective efficacy for specific tasks. Utilizing survey and administrative data from 4,093 residents nested in 148 communities in Australia, we distinguish collective efficacy for particular threats to social order and assess the relative importance of social cohesion and neighborhood social ties to the development of collective efficacy for violence, delinquency and civic/political issues. Our results indicate that a model separating collective efficacy for specific problems from social ties and the more generalized notions of social cohesion is necessary when understanding the regulation potential of neighborhoods.",
keywords = "Collective efficacy, Community, Social cohesion, Social ties",
author = "Rebecca Wickes and Hipp, {John R.} and Elise Sargeant and Ross Homel",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10464-013-9582-6",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "115--127",
journal = "American Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0091-0562",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1-2",

}

Collective efficacy as a task specific process : Examining the relationship between social ties, neighborhood cohesion and the capacity to respond to violence, delinquency and civic problems. / Wickes, Rebecca; Hipp, John R.; Sargeant, Elise; Homel, Ross.

In: American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 1-2, 09.2013, p. 115-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collective efficacy as a task specific process

T2 - Examining the relationship between social ties, neighborhood cohesion and the capacity to respond to violence, delinquency and civic problems

AU - Wickes, Rebecca

AU - Hipp, John R.

AU - Sargeant, Elise

AU - Homel, Ross

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - In the neighborhood effects literature, collective efficacy is viewed as the key explanatory process associated with the spatial distribution of a range of social problems. While many studies usefully focus on the consequences of collective efficacy, in this paper we examine the task specificity of collective efficacy and consider the individual and neighborhood factors that influence residents' perceptions of neighborhood collective efficacy for specific tasks. Utilizing survey and administrative data from 4,093 residents nested in 148 communities in Australia, we distinguish collective efficacy for particular threats to social order and assess the relative importance of social cohesion and neighborhood social ties to the development of collective efficacy for violence, delinquency and civic/political issues. Our results indicate that a model separating collective efficacy for specific problems from social ties and the more generalized notions of social cohesion is necessary when understanding the regulation potential of neighborhoods.

AB - In the neighborhood effects literature, collective efficacy is viewed as the key explanatory process associated with the spatial distribution of a range of social problems. While many studies usefully focus on the consequences of collective efficacy, in this paper we examine the task specificity of collective efficacy and consider the individual and neighborhood factors that influence residents' perceptions of neighborhood collective efficacy for specific tasks. Utilizing survey and administrative data from 4,093 residents nested in 148 communities in Australia, we distinguish collective efficacy for particular threats to social order and assess the relative importance of social cohesion and neighborhood social ties to the development of collective efficacy for violence, delinquency and civic/political issues. Our results indicate that a model separating collective efficacy for specific problems from social ties and the more generalized notions of social cohesion is necessary when understanding the regulation potential of neighborhoods.

KW - Collective efficacy

KW - Community

KW - Social cohesion

KW - Social ties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881023201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10464-013-9582-6

DO - 10.1007/s10464-013-9582-6

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 115

EP - 127

JO - American Journal of Community Psychology

JF - American Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0091-0562

IS - 1-2

ER -