Abstract
Although we live in an era in which government and private organisations collect large amounts of data, this has not filtered through to anti-discrimination and equality law in Australia. Government and its agencies have little incentive to collect information, nor does business. Neither group bears any obligation to tackle discrimination if they detect it. Yet the self-regulating enforcement model used in equality law is premised on the idea that information will be available to aid voluntary compliance. This article examines the nature of the data organisations that are currently required to collect and identify significant information gaps. It argues that it is not enough to simply fill those gaps with information; increased data collection needs to be accompanied by the obligation to address inequality if that is what the data reveals.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 88-97 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Law in Context |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Aug 2021 |
Keywords
- Data
- Equality
- Discrimination
- Law
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Using transparency to achieve equality
Blackham, A. (Primary Chief Investigator (PCI)), Thornton, M. (Chief Investigator (CI)) & Allen, D. (Chief Investigator (CI))
23/07/20 → 24/07/20
Project: Research
Activities
- 1 Contribution to conference
-
Berkeley Comparative Equality & Anti-discrimination Law Study Group Conference 2019
Allen, D. (Speaker) & Blackham, A. (Speaker)
2019Activity: Participating in or organising an event types › Contribution to conference
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver