Co-design or top-down welfare conditionality? An analysis of the impact of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander submissions to six parliamentary inquiries into the Cashless Debit Card

Philip Mendes, Steven Roche, Lisa Conway, Lani Castan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The former Coalition Commonwealth Government consistently asserted that representative Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter Indigenous) organisations supported the introduction of the Cashless Debit Card (CDC) in multiple trial sites. Consequently, they depicted the CDC policy as an alleged exemplar of a co-designed policy model based on partnership with Indigenous community groups. This article examines the validity of this argument by analysing the views expressed by Indigenous organisations via written and oral submissions to the six parliamentary inquiries into the CDC from 2015 to 2020. Our findings suggest that with the exception of the first inquiry, most Indigenous submissions opposed the introduction or the expansion of the CDC. Yet, these critical views received only limited acknowledgement in the inquiry reports, and seem to have little or no impact on government policy concerning the CDC. It appears that the CDC policy is more accurately identified as a top-down policy imposed by government on local Aboriginal communities which, with some exceptions, neither requested nor consented to the policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-193
Number of pages27
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Aboriginal community-controlled organisations
  • Cashless Debit Card
  • co-design
  • parliamentary inquiries

Cite this