Abstract
Cluster-randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for assessing efficacy of community-level interventions, such as vector-control strategies against dengue. We describe a novel cluster-randomized trial methodology with a test-negative design (CR-TND), which offers advantages over traditional approaches. This method uses outcome-based sampling of patients presenting with a syndrome consistent with the disease of interest,who are subsequently classified as test-positive cases or test-negative controls on the basis of diagnostic testing.We used simulations of a cluster trial to demonstrate validity of efficacy estimates under the test-negative approach. We demonstrated that, provided study arms are balanced for both test-negative and test-positive illness at baseline and that other test-negative design assumptions are met, the efficacy estimates closely match true efficacy. Analytical considerations for an odds ratio-based effect estimate arising from clustered data and potential approaches to analysis are also discussed briefly. We concluded that application of the test-negative design to certain clusterrandomized trials could increase their efficiency and ease of implementation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2021-2028 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | American Journal of Epidemiology |
| Volume | 187 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Case-control
- Cluster-randomized trial
- Dengue
- Efficacy
- Odds ratio
- Study design
- Test-negative design
- Wolbachia
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver