Cluster analysis and subgrouping to investigate inter-individual variability to non-invasive brain stimulation: A systematic review

Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour Jaberzadeh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Cluster analysis and other subgrouping techniques have risen in popularity in recent years in non-invasive brain stimulation research in the attempt to investigate the issue of inter-individual variability - the issue of why some individuals respond, as traditionally expected, to non-invasive brain stimulation protocols and others do not. Cluster analysis and subgrouping techniques have been used to categorise individuals, based on their response patterns, as responder or non-responders. There is, however, a lack of consensus and consistency on the most appropriate technique to use. This systematic review aimed to provide a systematic summary of the cluster analysis and subgrouping techniques used to date and suggest recommendations moving forward. Twenty studies were included that utilised subgrouping techniques, while seven of these additionally utilised cluster analysis techniques. The results of this systematic review appear to indicate that statistical cluster analysis techniques are effective in identifying subgroups of individuals based on response patterns to non-invasive brain stimulation. This systematic review also reports a lack of consensus amongst researchers on the most effective subgrouping technique and the criteria used to determine whether an individual is categorised as a responder or a non-responder. This systematic review provides a step-by-step guide to carrying out statistical cluster analyses and subgrouping techniques to provide a framework for analysis when developing further insights into the contributing factors of inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages23
JournalReviews in the Neurosciences
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • grand mean average
  • non-responder
  • responder

Cite this

@article{b1c920dedd8a4a7aa98d2f07a297c925,
title = "Cluster analysis and subgrouping to investigate inter-individual variability to non-invasive brain stimulation: A systematic review",
abstract = "Cluster analysis and other subgrouping techniques have risen in popularity in recent years in non-invasive brain stimulation research in the attempt to investigate the issue of inter-individual variability - the issue of why some individuals respond, as traditionally expected, to non-invasive brain stimulation protocols and others do not. Cluster analysis and subgrouping techniques have been used to categorise individuals, based on their response patterns, as responder or non-responders. There is, however, a lack of consensus and consistency on the most appropriate technique to use. This systematic review aimed to provide a systematic summary of the cluster analysis and subgrouping techniques used to date and suggest recommendations moving forward. Twenty studies were included that utilised subgrouping techniques, while seven of these additionally utilised cluster analysis techniques. The results of this systematic review appear to indicate that statistical cluster analysis techniques are effective in identifying subgroups of individuals based on response patterns to non-invasive brain stimulation. This systematic review also reports a lack of consensus amongst researchers on the most effective subgrouping technique and the criteria used to determine whether an individual is categorised as a responder or a non-responder. This systematic review provides a step-by-step guide to carrying out statistical cluster analyses and subgrouping techniques to provide a framework for analysis when developing further insights into the contributing factors of inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation.",
keywords = "grand mean average, non-responder, responder",
author = "Michael Pellegrini and Maryam Zoghi and Shapour Jaberzadeh",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1515/revneuro-2017-0083",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
journal = "Reviews in the Neurosciences",
issn = "0334-1763",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter",
number = "6",

}

Cluster analysis and subgrouping to investigate inter-individual variability to non-invasive brain stimulation : A systematic review. / Pellegrini, Michael; Zoghi, Maryam; Jaberzadeh, Shapour.

In: Reviews in the Neurosciences, Vol. 29, No. 6, 08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cluster analysis and subgrouping to investigate inter-individual variability to non-invasive brain stimulation

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Pellegrini, Michael

AU - Zoghi, Maryam

AU - Jaberzadeh, Shapour

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - Cluster analysis and other subgrouping techniques have risen in popularity in recent years in non-invasive brain stimulation research in the attempt to investigate the issue of inter-individual variability - the issue of why some individuals respond, as traditionally expected, to non-invasive brain stimulation protocols and others do not. Cluster analysis and subgrouping techniques have been used to categorise individuals, based on their response patterns, as responder or non-responders. There is, however, a lack of consensus and consistency on the most appropriate technique to use. This systematic review aimed to provide a systematic summary of the cluster analysis and subgrouping techniques used to date and suggest recommendations moving forward. Twenty studies were included that utilised subgrouping techniques, while seven of these additionally utilised cluster analysis techniques. The results of this systematic review appear to indicate that statistical cluster analysis techniques are effective in identifying subgroups of individuals based on response patterns to non-invasive brain stimulation. This systematic review also reports a lack of consensus amongst researchers on the most effective subgrouping technique and the criteria used to determine whether an individual is categorised as a responder or a non-responder. This systematic review provides a step-by-step guide to carrying out statistical cluster analyses and subgrouping techniques to provide a framework for analysis when developing further insights into the contributing factors of inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation.

AB - Cluster analysis and other subgrouping techniques have risen in popularity in recent years in non-invasive brain stimulation research in the attempt to investigate the issue of inter-individual variability - the issue of why some individuals respond, as traditionally expected, to non-invasive brain stimulation protocols and others do not. Cluster analysis and subgrouping techniques have been used to categorise individuals, based on their response patterns, as responder or non-responders. There is, however, a lack of consensus and consistency on the most appropriate technique to use. This systematic review aimed to provide a systematic summary of the cluster analysis and subgrouping techniques used to date and suggest recommendations moving forward. Twenty studies were included that utilised subgrouping techniques, while seven of these additionally utilised cluster analysis techniques. The results of this systematic review appear to indicate that statistical cluster analysis techniques are effective in identifying subgroups of individuals based on response patterns to non-invasive brain stimulation. This systematic review also reports a lack of consensus amongst researchers on the most effective subgrouping technique and the criteria used to determine whether an individual is categorised as a responder or a non-responder. This systematic review provides a step-by-step guide to carrying out statistical cluster analyses and subgrouping techniques to provide a framework for analysis when developing further insights into the contributing factors of inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation.

KW - grand mean average

KW - non-responder

KW - responder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040936981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/revneuro-2017-0083

DO - 10.1515/revneuro-2017-0083

M3 - Article

VL - 29

JO - Reviews in the Neurosciences

JF - Reviews in the Neurosciences

SN - 0334-1763

IS - 6

ER -