Clinician and manager perceptions of factors leading to ward patient clinical deterioration

Joshua Allen, Daryl Jones, Judy Currey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Improving the timely recognition and response to clinical deterioration is a critical challenge for clinicians, educators, administrators and researchers. Clinical deterioration leading to Rapid Response Team review is associated with poor patient outcomes. A range of factors associated with clinical deterioration and its outcomes have been identified, and may help with early identification of deteriorating patients. However, the relative importance of each factor on the development of clinical deterioration is unknown. Objective: To identify the relative importance of factors contributing to the development of clinical deterioration in ward patients, as perceived by health professionals who have experience in recognising or responding to clinical deterioration, or in the management, administration or governance of RRSs. Methods: A written questionnaire containing 12 pre-determined factors was provided to participants. Participants were asked to rank the items from most to least important contributors to ward patient deterioration. The study took place during a session of the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Rapid Response Team conference. Results: A final sample of 233 (83% response rate), returned the questionnaire. The sample comprised specialist ICU registered nurses with direct patient contact (64%), ICU consultant doctors (17%), ICU nurse managers (7%), hospital administrators (2%), ICU registrars (2%), quality coordinators (2%) and non-hospital staff (4%). The patient's presenting illness/main diagnosis was the highest ranked factor, followed by pre-existing co-morbidities, seniority of nursing ward staff, medical documentation, senior medical staff, and interdisciplinary communication. Almost two-thirds of participants ranked patient characteristics as the most important contributor to clinical deterioration. Conclusion: Health professionals who have experience in recognising or responding to clinical deterioration, or in the management, administration or governance of RRSs perceive that patient characteristics such as the patient's primary diagnosis and comorbidities to be the most important contributors to clinical deterioration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-375
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Critical Care
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Clinical deterioration
  • Medical emergency team
  • Outcome
  • Rapid response system
  • Rapid Response Team

Cite this

@article{2fd7c65b84524efa84646a64dfb297ad,
title = "Clinician and manager perceptions of factors leading to ward patient clinical deterioration",
abstract = "Background: Improving the timely recognition and response to clinical deterioration is a critical challenge for clinicians, educators, administrators and researchers. Clinical deterioration leading to Rapid Response Team review is associated with poor patient outcomes. A range of factors associated with clinical deterioration and its outcomes have been identified, and may help with early identification of deteriorating patients. However, the relative importance of each factor on the development of clinical deterioration is unknown. Objective: To identify the relative importance of factors contributing to the development of clinical deterioration in ward patients, as perceived by health professionals who have experience in recognising or responding to clinical deterioration, or in the management, administration or governance of RRSs. Methods: A written questionnaire containing 12 pre-determined factors was provided to participants. Participants were asked to rank the items from most to least important contributors to ward patient deterioration. The study took place during a session of the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Rapid Response Team conference. Results: A final sample of 233 (83{\%} response rate), returned the questionnaire. The sample comprised specialist ICU registered nurses with direct patient contact (64{\%}), ICU consultant doctors (17{\%}), ICU nurse managers (7{\%}), hospital administrators (2{\%}), ICU registrars (2{\%}), quality coordinators (2{\%}) and non-hospital staff (4{\%}). The patient's presenting illness/main diagnosis was the highest ranked factor, followed by pre-existing co-morbidities, seniority of nursing ward staff, medical documentation, senior medical staff, and interdisciplinary communication. Almost two-thirds of participants ranked patient characteristics as the most important contributor to clinical deterioration. Conclusion: Health professionals who have experience in recognising or responding to clinical deterioration, or in the management, administration or governance of RRSs perceive that patient characteristics such as the patient's primary diagnosis and comorbidities to be the most important contributors to clinical deterioration.",
keywords = "Clinical deterioration, Medical emergency team, Outcome, Rapid response system, Rapid Response Team",
author = "Joshua Allen and Daryl Jones and Judy Currey",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.aucc.2017.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "369--375",
journal = "Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses",
issn = "1036-7314",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Clinician and manager perceptions of factors leading to ward patient clinical deterioration. / Allen, Joshua; Jones, Daryl; Currey, Judy.

In: Australian Critical Care, Vol. 31, No. 6, 11.2018, p. 369-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinician and manager perceptions of factors leading to ward patient clinical deterioration

AU - Allen, Joshua

AU - Jones, Daryl

AU - Currey, Judy

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - Background: Improving the timely recognition and response to clinical deterioration is a critical challenge for clinicians, educators, administrators and researchers. Clinical deterioration leading to Rapid Response Team review is associated with poor patient outcomes. A range of factors associated with clinical deterioration and its outcomes have been identified, and may help with early identification of deteriorating patients. However, the relative importance of each factor on the development of clinical deterioration is unknown. Objective: To identify the relative importance of factors contributing to the development of clinical deterioration in ward patients, as perceived by health professionals who have experience in recognising or responding to clinical deterioration, or in the management, administration or governance of RRSs. Methods: A written questionnaire containing 12 pre-determined factors was provided to participants. Participants were asked to rank the items from most to least important contributors to ward patient deterioration. The study took place during a session of the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Rapid Response Team conference. Results: A final sample of 233 (83% response rate), returned the questionnaire. The sample comprised specialist ICU registered nurses with direct patient contact (64%), ICU consultant doctors (17%), ICU nurse managers (7%), hospital administrators (2%), ICU registrars (2%), quality coordinators (2%) and non-hospital staff (4%). The patient's presenting illness/main diagnosis was the highest ranked factor, followed by pre-existing co-morbidities, seniority of nursing ward staff, medical documentation, senior medical staff, and interdisciplinary communication. Almost two-thirds of participants ranked patient characteristics as the most important contributor to clinical deterioration. Conclusion: Health professionals who have experience in recognising or responding to clinical deterioration, or in the management, administration or governance of RRSs perceive that patient characteristics such as the patient's primary diagnosis and comorbidities to be the most important contributors to clinical deterioration.

AB - Background: Improving the timely recognition and response to clinical deterioration is a critical challenge for clinicians, educators, administrators and researchers. Clinical deterioration leading to Rapid Response Team review is associated with poor patient outcomes. A range of factors associated with clinical deterioration and its outcomes have been identified, and may help with early identification of deteriorating patients. However, the relative importance of each factor on the development of clinical deterioration is unknown. Objective: To identify the relative importance of factors contributing to the development of clinical deterioration in ward patients, as perceived by health professionals who have experience in recognising or responding to clinical deterioration, or in the management, administration or governance of RRSs. Methods: A written questionnaire containing 12 pre-determined factors was provided to participants. Participants were asked to rank the items from most to least important contributors to ward patient deterioration. The study took place during a session of the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Rapid Response Team conference. Results: A final sample of 233 (83% response rate), returned the questionnaire. The sample comprised specialist ICU registered nurses with direct patient contact (64%), ICU consultant doctors (17%), ICU nurse managers (7%), hospital administrators (2%), ICU registrars (2%), quality coordinators (2%) and non-hospital staff (4%). The patient's presenting illness/main diagnosis was the highest ranked factor, followed by pre-existing co-morbidities, seniority of nursing ward staff, medical documentation, senior medical staff, and interdisciplinary communication. Almost two-thirds of participants ranked patient characteristics as the most important contributor to clinical deterioration. Conclusion: Health professionals who have experience in recognising or responding to clinical deterioration, or in the management, administration or governance of RRSs perceive that patient characteristics such as the patient's primary diagnosis and comorbidities to be the most important contributors to clinical deterioration.

KW - Clinical deterioration

KW - Medical emergency team

KW - Outcome

KW - Rapid response system

KW - Rapid Response Team

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034438110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 369

EP - 375

JO - Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses

JF - Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses

SN - 1036-7314

IS - 6

ER -