TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU
AU - Devlin, John W.
AU - Skrobik, Yoanna
AU - Gélinas, Céline
AU - Needham, Dale M.
AU - Slooter, Arjen J.C.
AU - Pandharipande, Pratik P.
AU - Watson, Paula L.
AU - Weinhouse, Gerald L.
AU - Nunnally, Mark E.
AU - Rochwerg, Bram
AU - Balas, Michele C.
AU - van den Boogaard, Mark
AU - Bosma, Karen J.
AU - Brummel, Nathaniel E.
AU - Chanques, Gerald
AU - Denehy, Linda
AU - Drouot, Xavier
AU - Fraser, Gilles L.
AU - Harris, Jocelyn E.
AU - Joffe, Aaron M.
AU - Kho, Michelle E.
AU - Kress, John P.
AU - Lanphere, Julie A.
AU - McKinley, Sharon
AU - Neufeld, Karin J.
AU - Pisani, Margaret A.
AU - Payen, Jean Francois
AU - Pun, Brenda T.
AU - Puntillo, Kathleen A.
AU - Riker, Richard R.
AU - Robinson, Bryce R.H.
AU - Shehabi, Yahya
AU - Szumita, Paul M.
AU - Winkelman, Chris
AU - Centofanti, John E.
AU - Price, Carrie
AU - Nikayin, Sina
AU - Misak, Cheryl J.
AU - Flood, Pamela D.
AU - Kiedrowski, Ken
AU - Alhazzani, Waleed
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To update and expand the 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the ICU. DESIGN: Thirty-two international experts, four methodologists, and four critical illness survivors met virtually at least monthly. All section groups gathered face-to-face at annual Society of Critical Care Medicine congresses; virtual connections included those unable to attend. A formal conflict of interest policy was developed a priori and enforced throughout the process. Teleconferences and electronic discussions among subgroups and whole panel were part of the guidelines' development. A general content review was completed face-to-face by all panel members in January 2017. METHODS: Content experts, methodologists, and ICU survivors were represented in each of the five sections of the guidelines: Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption). Each section created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome, and nonactionable, descriptive questions based on perceived clinical relevance. The guideline group then voted their ranking, and patients prioritized their importance. For each Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome question, sections searched the best available evidence, determined its quality, and formulated recommendations as "strong," "conditional," or "good" practice statements based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. In addition, evidence gaps and clinical caveats were explicitly identified. RESULTS: The Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) panel issued 37 recommendations (three strong and 34 conditional), two good practice statements, and 32 ungraded, nonactionable statements. Three questions from the patient-centered prioritized question list remained without recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial agreement among a large, interdisciplinary cohort of international experts regarding evidence supporting recommendations, and the remaining literature gaps in the assessment, prevention, and treatment of Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) in critically ill adults. Highlighting this evidence and the research needs will improve Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) management and provide the foundation for improved outcomes and science in this vulnerable population.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To update and expand the 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the ICU. DESIGN: Thirty-two international experts, four methodologists, and four critical illness survivors met virtually at least monthly. All section groups gathered face-to-face at annual Society of Critical Care Medicine congresses; virtual connections included those unable to attend. A formal conflict of interest policy was developed a priori and enforced throughout the process. Teleconferences and electronic discussions among subgroups and whole panel were part of the guidelines' development. A general content review was completed face-to-face by all panel members in January 2017. METHODS: Content experts, methodologists, and ICU survivors were represented in each of the five sections of the guidelines: Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption). Each section created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome, and nonactionable, descriptive questions based on perceived clinical relevance. The guideline group then voted their ranking, and patients prioritized their importance. For each Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome question, sections searched the best available evidence, determined its quality, and formulated recommendations as "strong," "conditional," or "good" practice statements based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. In addition, evidence gaps and clinical caveats were explicitly identified. RESULTS: The Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) panel issued 37 recommendations (three strong and 34 conditional), two good practice statements, and 32 ungraded, nonactionable statements. Three questions from the patient-centered prioritized question list remained without recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial agreement among a large, interdisciplinary cohort of international experts regarding evidence supporting recommendations, and the remaining literature gaps in the assessment, prevention, and treatment of Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) in critically ill adults. Highlighting this evidence and the research needs will improve Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) management and provide the foundation for improved outcomes and science in this vulnerable population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060764483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299
M3 - Article
C2 - 30113379
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 46
SP - e825-e873
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 9
ER -