Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical outcomes after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in women with advanced reproductive age undergoing in vitro fertilization: a propensity score-matched cohort study

  • Chunyan Sun
  • , Mingming Ye
  • , Yuanyuan Wu
  • , Qiaoyu Chen
  • , Zhenzhen Meng
  • , Lulu Geng
  • , Orhan Bukulmez
  • , Ben W. Mol
  • , Xiaoming Teng
  • , Miaoxin Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare clinical outcomes following fresh or frozen embryo transfer (FET) in women with advanced reproductive age (ARA). Women aged 35–45 years who underwent their first autologous fresh or frozen cleavage stage embryo transfer cycle in the Centre for Assisted Reproduction of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 were included. The primary outcome was live birth after the first embryo transfer of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Multiple covariates were used for propensity score matching (PSM) and generalized estimating equations were performed to examine the independent association between FET and live birth. Of the total 1453 patients, 327 patients had FET and 1126 patients had fresh ET. After the PSM procedure, 274 patients were included in each group. The live birth rate was 24.8% in the FET group and 25.2% in the fresh ET group (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.67–1.44, P = 0.92). Other pregnancy, perinatal and neonatal outcomes were all comparable between the two groups. This study showed that FET did not improve live birth and other clinical outcomes as compared with fresh embryo transfer in women with ARA who underwent their first IVF cycle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1459-1468
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Fertility
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2023

Keywords

  • Frozen embryo transfer
  • in vitro fertilization
  • live birth
  • propensity score matching
  • women with advanced reproductive age

Cite this