Abstract
A one-premiss rule is said to be archetypal for a consequence relation when not only is the conclusion of any application of the rule a consequence (according to that relation) of the premiss, but whenever one formula has another as a consequence, these formulas are respectively equivalent to a premiss and a conclusion of some application of the rule. We are concerned here with the consequence relation of classical propositional logic and with the task of extending the above notion of archetypality to rules with more than one premiss, and providing an informative characterization of the set of rules falling under the more general notion.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 279-294 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Review of Symbolic Logic |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2018 |
Keywords
- archetypal rules
- consequence relations
- inference rules