TY - JOUR
T1 - Choice of biopsy devices for post-mortem CT-guided biopsy
AU - Higgins, Samantha
AU - Parsons, Sarah
AU - Woodford, Noel
AU - Briggs, Christopher
AU - Cauchi, David
AU - O'Donnell, Chris
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Aim: To assess technical features of multiple biopsy devices for post-mortem CT-guided biopsy (PMCTB). Methods: Five different BARD® clinical biopsy devices, including spring-loaded and vacuum-assisted, were used to perform percutaneous biopsy of the liver in a deceased person using the largest gauge needle size available in each. A standard co-axial biopsy technique was used for all devices except SenoRX®. Specimens were placed on sponge in cassettes for initial fixation and then processed using routine histological techniques. The devices were assessed by a team consisting of a forensic technician, forensic radiologist and two forensic pathologists (one blinded to the type of device used). Assessment parameters included technical performance, cost of device, and specimen review under light microscopy. Results/discussion: The Max-core® and Magnum® devices were mechanically easy to load, fire and retrieve specimens. The Finesse® and Vacora® provided advanced technical features. On histological review the tissue sample from the Vacora® was judged to be of higher quality. Due to the permanent needle attachment to the vacuum machine, the SenoRX® was deemed impractical. Histological artefacts identified included stretch-crush cellular damage likely from the use of vacuum-assisted devices, and tissue breakage from the use of cassette sponges. Conclusion: The 2 spring-loaded biopsy devices are considered the most appropriate for PMCTB tissue sampling based on ease-of-use, lowest cost and provision of diagnosable biopsy specimens.
AB - Aim: To assess technical features of multiple biopsy devices for post-mortem CT-guided biopsy (PMCTB). Methods: Five different BARD® clinical biopsy devices, including spring-loaded and vacuum-assisted, were used to perform percutaneous biopsy of the liver in a deceased person using the largest gauge needle size available in each. A standard co-axial biopsy technique was used for all devices except SenoRX®. Specimens were placed on sponge in cassettes for initial fixation and then processed using routine histological techniques. The devices were assessed by a team consisting of a forensic technician, forensic radiologist and two forensic pathologists (one blinded to the type of device used). Assessment parameters included technical performance, cost of device, and specimen review under light microscopy. Results/discussion: The Max-core® and Magnum® devices were mechanically easy to load, fire and retrieve specimens. The Finesse® and Vacora® provided advanced technical features. On histological review the tissue sample from the Vacora® was judged to be of higher quality. Due to the permanent needle attachment to the vacuum machine, the SenoRX® was deemed impractical. Histological artefacts identified included stretch-crush cellular damage likely from the use of vacuum-assisted devices, and tissue breakage from the use of cassette sponges. Conclusion: The 2 spring-loaded biopsy devices are considered the most appropriate for PMCTB tissue sampling based on ease-of-use, lowest cost and provision of diagnosable biopsy specimens.
KW - CT biopsy
KW - Histology artefact
KW - Post-mortem biopsy
KW - Post-mortem histology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960931772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jofri.2015.12.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jofri.2015.12.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84960931772
SN - 2212-4780
VL - 5
SP - 15
EP - 19
JO - Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging
JF - Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging
ER -