Chemokine-related gene expression in the brain following ischemic stroke: No role for CXCR2 in outcome

Vanessa H Brait, Jennifer Rivera, Bradley RS Broughton, Seyoung Sandy Lee, Grant R Drummond, Christopher G Sobey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)


This study sought to identify potential targets for acute stroke therapy that can be exploited pharmacologically beyond the current 4.5h time limit for clinical administration of recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator. We used PCR arrays to initially screen the temporal expression profiles of several chemokine-related genes in the brain at 4, 24 and 72h after stroke. We identified large increases (>10-fold) in mRNA at 24 or 72h for the neutrophil CXCR2 receptor, and for CXCL1 and CXCL2-two chemokine ligands expressed by monocytes and neutrophils with strong neutrophil chemoattractant activity via CXCR2. We then tested the efficacy of a CXCR2 antagonist as a therapeutic. Mice were treated with vehicle (1 DMSO) or SB225002 (2mg/kg per day, ip) commencing at reperfusion, and we evaluated chemokine gene expression, neutrophil infiltration and functional and histological endpoints of stroke outcome. Expression levels of CXCL1, CXCL2 and CXCR2 after 24h were markedly reduced to near normal levels in SB225002-treated mice. Myeloperoxidase-positive cell infiltration was significantly reduced in SB225002-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated mice, and was similar to levels in sham-operated mice. However, although SB225002 evidently antagonised the interaction between CXCR2 and its chemokine ligands in the ischemic brain, mice treated with either SB225002 or vehicle had similar motor impairment and infarct volume at 72h. Thus, the reduced expression of CXC chemokine subfamily genes and neutrophil-related infiltration following SB225002 administration did not improve outcome after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. CXCR2 antagonists are therefore unlikely to be a potential therapy for ischemic stroke.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169 - 179
Number of pages11
JournalBrain Research
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this