TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics of azathioprine use and cessation in a longitudinal lupus cohort
AU - Croyle, Lucy
AU - Hoi, Alberta
AU - Morand, Eric Francis
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for azathioprine (AZA) use in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), including indications for initiation and cessation, are lacking. Clinical decision-making could be improved if reasons for cessation of AZA treatment were standardised. METHODS: We determined the characteristics of AZA use in a cohort of patients with SLE and evaluated reasons for AZA cessation. Patients with SLE in a single centre had longitudinal recording of disease activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI)-2k), laboratory investigations and treatment from 2007 to 2012. RESULTS: Of 183 patients studied, 67 used AZA on at least one occasion. There was no significant difference between AZA users and non-users in age or American College of Rheumatology criteria. Compared with those not treated with AZA, patients treated with AZA had higher disease activity (time-adjusted mean SLEDAI 5.2+/-0.3 vs 3.8+/-0.3, p=0.0028) and damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-SDI 1.6+/-0.3 vs 1.2+/-0.1, p=0.0445), and were more likely to have a positive dsDNA (p=0.0130) and receive glucocorticoids (p
AB - OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for azathioprine (AZA) use in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), including indications for initiation and cessation, are lacking. Clinical decision-making could be improved if reasons for cessation of AZA treatment were standardised. METHODS: We determined the characteristics of AZA use in a cohort of patients with SLE and evaluated reasons for AZA cessation. Patients with SLE in a single centre had longitudinal recording of disease activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI)-2k), laboratory investigations and treatment from 2007 to 2012. RESULTS: Of 183 patients studied, 67 used AZA on at least one occasion. There was no significant difference between AZA users and non-users in age or American College of Rheumatology criteria. Compared with those not treated with AZA, patients treated with AZA had higher disease activity (time-adjusted mean SLEDAI 5.2+/-0.3 vs 3.8+/-0.3, p=0.0028) and damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-SDI 1.6+/-0.3 vs 1.2+/-0.1, p=0.0445), and were more likely to have a positive dsDNA (p=0.0130) and receive glucocorticoids (p
UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548066/pdf/lupus-2015-000105.pdf
U2 - 10.1136/lupus-2015-000105
DO - 10.1136/lupus-2015-000105
M3 - Article
SN - 2053-8790
VL - 2
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Lupus Science & Medicine
JF - Lupus Science & Medicine
ER -