Changes in well-being: complementing a psychosocial approach with neurobiological insights

Nikki Sue Rickard, Dianne Anne Vella-Brodrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The sustainability of changes in well-being achieved via positive interventions is challenged by findings that happiness levels are constrained by a homeostatic set-point. In this paper, we propose that while generally stable, the neurological and psychophysiological bases of well-being demonstrate plasticity. The neurobiological underpinnings of the hedonic component of well-being are first reviewed, demonstrating the value of both central (such as frontal asymmetry) and peripheral (such as heart rate variability) indices. Convergent evidence that certain well-being interventions are capable of modifying subjective, central and peripheral indices of positive affect or regulation of negative affect is then reported, although there is a clear need for longitudinal research to demonstrate the longevity of changes. It is recommended that a multi-level approach to evaluating positive interventions incorporating subjective psychosocial and neurobiological indices of affective change is adopted by researchers in an attempt to identify interventions most likely to achieve sustained positive outcome. Accumulating evidence through rigorous research that positive interventions can enhance psychosocial and neurophysiological factors can provide a compelling case for more widespread dissemination through public health policy
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437 - 457
Number of pages21
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Volume117
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{4de1523c65724a6db6df3207a3b4c7c7,
title = "Changes in well-being: complementing a psychosocial approach with neurobiological insights",
abstract = "The sustainability of changes in well-being achieved via positive interventions is challenged by findings that happiness levels are constrained by a homeostatic set-point. In this paper, we propose that while generally stable, the neurological and psychophysiological bases of well-being demonstrate plasticity. The neurobiological underpinnings of the hedonic component of well-being are first reviewed, demonstrating the value of both central (such as frontal asymmetry) and peripheral (such as heart rate variability) indices. Convergent evidence that certain well-being interventions are capable of modifying subjective, central and peripheral indices of positive affect or regulation of negative affect is then reported, although there is a clear need for longitudinal research to demonstrate the longevity of changes. It is recommended that a multi-level approach to evaluating positive interventions incorporating subjective psychosocial and neurobiological indices of affective change is adopted by researchers in an attempt to identify interventions most likely to achieve sustained positive outcome. Accumulating evidence through rigorous research that positive interventions can enhance psychosocial and neurophysiological factors can provide a compelling case for more widespread dissemination through public health policy",
author = "Rickard, {Nikki Sue} and Vella-Brodrick, {Dianne Anne}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11205-013-0353-4",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "437 -- 457",
journal = "Social Indicators Research",
issn = "0303-8300",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Changes in well-being: complementing a psychosocial approach with neurobiological insights. / Rickard, Nikki Sue; Vella-Brodrick, Dianne Anne.

In: Social Indicators Research, Vol. 117, No. 2, 2014, p. 437 - 457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in well-being: complementing a psychosocial approach with neurobiological insights

AU - Rickard, Nikki Sue

AU - Vella-Brodrick, Dianne Anne

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The sustainability of changes in well-being achieved via positive interventions is challenged by findings that happiness levels are constrained by a homeostatic set-point. In this paper, we propose that while generally stable, the neurological and psychophysiological bases of well-being demonstrate plasticity. The neurobiological underpinnings of the hedonic component of well-being are first reviewed, demonstrating the value of both central (such as frontal asymmetry) and peripheral (such as heart rate variability) indices. Convergent evidence that certain well-being interventions are capable of modifying subjective, central and peripheral indices of positive affect or regulation of negative affect is then reported, although there is a clear need for longitudinal research to demonstrate the longevity of changes. It is recommended that a multi-level approach to evaluating positive interventions incorporating subjective psychosocial and neurobiological indices of affective change is adopted by researchers in an attempt to identify interventions most likely to achieve sustained positive outcome. Accumulating evidence through rigorous research that positive interventions can enhance psychosocial and neurophysiological factors can provide a compelling case for more widespread dissemination through public health policy

AB - The sustainability of changes in well-being achieved via positive interventions is challenged by findings that happiness levels are constrained by a homeostatic set-point. In this paper, we propose that while generally stable, the neurological and psychophysiological bases of well-being demonstrate plasticity. The neurobiological underpinnings of the hedonic component of well-being are first reviewed, demonstrating the value of both central (such as frontal asymmetry) and peripheral (such as heart rate variability) indices. Convergent evidence that certain well-being interventions are capable of modifying subjective, central and peripheral indices of positive affect or regulation of negative affect is then reported, although there is a clear need for longitudinal research to demonstrate the longevity of changes. It is recommended that a multi-level approach to evaluating positive interventions incorporating subjective psychosocial and neurobiological indices of affective change is adopted by researchers in an attempt to identify interventions most likely to achieve sustained positive outcome. Accumulating evidence through rigorous research that positive interventions can enhance psychosocial and neurophysiological factors can provide a compelling case for more widespread dissemination through public health policy

UR - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11205-013-0353-4

U2 - 10.1007/s11205-013-0353-4

DO - 10.1007/s11205-013-0353-4

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 437

EP - 457

JO - Social Indicators Research

JF - Social Indicators Research

SN - 0303-8300

IS - 2

ER -