Challenges Associated with Anticipatory Medications in Rural and Remote Settings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anticipatory medications (AM) have been widely used in various settings across many countries in people approaching end of life. Access to palliative care in rural and remote areas of Australia is lacking as are other medical services when compared with the metropolitan setting. Our aim is to identify challenges with the administration and access to AM in rural and remote communities with outcomes to guide improved delivery of care. METHODS: An online survey administered using Qualtrics, a secure survey platform was distributed to a total of 18 managers from 18 rural and remote organizations across the South East of Victoria in Australia. The survey was distributed to a total of 108 nurses working in these organizations. RESULTS: A total of 29 nurses completed the survey (response rate 28%). Most of the nurses were working in a mixed practice providing community palliative and district nursing. A significant number of nurses (n = 9, 31%) were working in remote settings and the remainder were located in regional areas. Almost a third of all nurses surveyed did not have specific guidance regarding the use of AM for their patients. Opioids (55%) were by far the most commonly used AM followed by antiemetics (45%). The most common decisions taken by nurses to administer AM were cited as patient deterioration or in their terminal phase with a fluctuating level of anxiety, and patients agitation. Access to AM and lack of staff education were major challenges in rural and remote areas. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of timely AM has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients and their caregivers. Key barriers to access AM can be overcome with community-level planning and nurses' education. Advanced nurses' roles have the opportunity to provide specialized care where access to specialist physicians is challenging.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-301
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • anticipatory medications
  • community nursing
  • end of life
  • palliative care
  • rural and remote

Cite this

@article{39bb41ebd6664119a768bb7d5f49abd4,
title = "Challenges Associated with Anticipatory Medications in Rural and Remote Settings",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Anticipatory medications (AM) have been widely used in various settings across many countries in people approaching end of life. Access to palliative care in rural and remote areas of Australia is lacking as are other medical services when compared with the metropolitan setting. Our aim is to identify challenges with the administration and access to AM in rural and remote communities with outcomes to guide improved delivery of care. METHODS: An online survey administered using Qualtrics, a secure survey platform was distributed to a total of 18 managers from 18 rural and remote organizations across the South East of Victoria in Australia. The survey was distributed to a total of 108 nurses working in these organizations. RESULTS: A total of 29 nurses completed the survey (response rate 28{\%}). Most of the nurses were working in a mixed practice providing community palliative and district nursing. A significant number of nurses (n = 9, 31{\%}) were working in remote settings and the remainder were located in regional areas. Almost a third of all nurses surveyed did not have specific guidance regarding the use of AM for their patients. Opioids (55{\%}) were by far the most commonly used AM followed by antiemetics (45{\%}). The most common decisions taken by nurses to administer AM were cited as patient deterioration or in their terminal phase with a fluctuating level of anxiety, and patients agitation. Access to AM and lack of staff education were major challenges in rural and remote areas. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of timely AM has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients and their caregivers. Key barriers to access AM can be overcome with community-level planning and nurses' education. Advanced nurses' roles have the opportunity to provide specialized care where access to specialist physicians is challenging.",
keywords = "anticipatory medications, community nursing, end of life, palliative care, rural and remote",
author = "Hanan Khalil and Peter Poon and Anny Byrne and Eli Ristevski",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2018.0354",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "297--301",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc",
number = "3",

}

Challenges Associated with Anticipatory Medications in Rural and Remote Settings. / Khalil, Hanan; Poon, Peter; Byrne, Anny; Ristevski, Eli.

In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 297-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges Associated with Anticipatory Medications in Rural and Remote Settings

AU - Khalil, Hanan

AU - Poon, Peter

AU - Byrne, Anny

AU - Ristevski, Eli

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Anticipatory medications (AM) have been widely used in various settings across many countries in people approaching end of life. Access to palliative care in rural and remote areas of Australia is lacking as are other medical services when compared with the metropolitan setting. Our aim is to identify challenges with the administration and access to AM in rural and remote communities with outcomes to guide improved delivery of care. METHODS: An online survey administered using Qualtrics, a secure survey platform was distributed to a total of 18 managers from 18 rural and remote organizations across the South East of Victoria in Australia. The survey was distributed to a total of 108 nurses working in these organizations. RESULTS: A total of 29 nurses completed the survey (response rate 28%). Most of the nurses were working in a mixed practice providing community palliative and district nursing. A significant number of nurses (n = 9, 31%) were working in remote settings and the remainder were located in regional areas. Almost a third of all nurses surveyed did not have specific guidance regarding the use of AM for their patients. Opioids (55%) were by far the most commonly used AM followed by antiemetics (45%). The most common decisions taken by nurses to administer AM were cited as patient deterioration or in their terminal phase with a fluctuating level of anxiety, and patients agitation. Access to AM and lack of staff education were major challenges in rural and remote areas. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of timely AM has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients and their caregivers. Key barriers to access AM can be overcome with community-level planning and nurses' education. Advanced nurses' roles have the opportunity to provide specialized care where access to specialist physicians is challenging.

AB - BACKGROUND: Anticipatory medications (AM) have been widely used in various settings across many countries in people approaching end of life. Access to palliative care in rural and remote areas of Australia is lacking as are other medical services when compared with the metropolitan setting. Our aim is to identify challenges with the administration and access to AM in rural and remote communities with outcomes to guide improved delivery of care. METHODS: An online survey administered using Qualtrics, a secure survey platform was distributed to a total of 18 managers from 18 rural and remote organizations across the South East of Victoria in Australia. The survey was distributed to a total of 108 nurses working in these organizations. RESULTS: A total of 29 nurses completed the survey (response rate 28%). Most of the nurses were working in a mixed practice providing community palliative and district nursing. A significant number of nurses (n = 9, 31%) were working in remote settings and the remainder were located in regional areas. Almost a third of all nurses surveyed did not have specific guidance regarding the use of AM for their patients. Opioids (55%) were by far the most commonly used AM followed by antiemetics (45%). The most common decisions taken by nurses to administer AM were cited as patient deterioration or in their terminal phase with a fluctuating level of anxiety, and patients agitation. Access to AM and lack of staff education were major challenges in rural and remote areas. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of timely AM has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients and their caregivers. Key barriers to access AM can be overcome with community-level planning and nurses' education. Advanced nurses' roles have the opportunity to provide specialized care where access to specialist physicians is challenging.

KW - anticipatory medications

KW - community nursing

KW - end of life

KW - palliative care

KW - rural and remote

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062037137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2018.0354

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2018.0354

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 297

EP - 301

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 3

ER -