Case load and valve surgery outcome in Australia

E. Anne Russell, Robert A. Baker, Jayme S. Bennetts, Alex Brown, Christopher M. Reid, Robert Tam, Lavinia Tran, Warren F. Walsh, Graeme P. Maguire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background In Australia it has been suggested that heart valve surgery, particularly for rheumatic heart disease (RHD), should be consolidated in higher volume centres. International studies of cardiac surgery suggest large volume centres have superior outcomes. However the effect of site and surgeon case load on longer term outcomes for valve surgery has not been investigated. Methods The Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database was analysed. The adjusted association between both average annual site and surgeon case load on short term complications and short and long-term survival was determined. Results Outcomes associated with 20,116 valve procedures at 25 surgical sites and by 93 surgeons were analysed. Overall adjusted analysis showed increasing site and surgeon case load was associated with longer ventilation, less reoperation and more anticoagulant complications. Increasing surgeon case load was also associated with less acute kidney injury. Adjusted 30-day mortality was not associated with site or surgeon case load. There was no consistent relationship between increasing site case load and long term survival. The association between surgeon case load and outcome demonstrated poorer adjusted survival in the highest volume surgeon group. Conclusions In this Australian study, the adjusted association between surgeon and site case load was not simple or consistent. Overall larger volume sites or surgeons did not have superior outcomes. Mandating a particular site case load level for valve surgery or a minimum number of procedures for individual surgeons, in an Australian context, cannot be supported by these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-151
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume221
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Cardiac surgery
  • Hospital performance
  • Indigenous health
  • Outcome indicators
  • Rheumatic valve surgery
  • Volume–outcome relationship

Cite this

Russell, E. Anne ; Baker, Robert A. ; Bennetts, Jayme S. ; Brown, Alex ; Reid, Christopher M. ; Tam, Robert ; Tran, Lavinia ; Walsh, Warren F. ; Maguire, Graeme P. / Case load and valve surgery outcome in Australia. In: International Journal of Cardiology. 2016 ; Vol. 221. pp. 144-151.
@article{e9ba893132ea4c18b51b9b6e18e99586,
title = "Case load and valve surgery outcome in Australia",
abstract = "Background In Australia it has been suggested that heart valve surgery, particularly for rheumatic heart disease (RHD), should be consolidated in higher volume centres. International studies of cardiac surgery suggest large volume centres have superior outcomes. However the effect of site and surgeon case load on longer term outcomes for valve surgery has not been investigated. Methods The Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database was analysed. The adjusted association between both average annual site and surgeon case load on short term complications and short and long-term survival was determined. Results Outcomes associated with 20,116 valve procedures at 25 surgical sites and by 93 surgeons were analysed. Overall adjusted analysis showed increasing site and surgeon case load was associated with longer ventilation, less reoperation and more anticoagulant complications. Increasing surgeon case load was also associated with less acute kidney injury. Adjusted 30-day mortality was not associated with site or surgeon case load. There was no consistent relationship between increasing site case load and long term survival. The association between surgeon case load and outcome demonstrated poorer adjusted survival in the highest volume surgeon group. Conclusions In this Australian study, the adjusted association between surgeon and site case load was not simple or consistent. Overall larger volume sites or surgeons did not have superior outcomes. Mandating a particular site case load level for valve surgery or a minimum number of procedures for individual surgeons, in an Australian context, cannot be supported by these findings.",
keywords = "Cardiac surgery, Hospital performance, Indigenous health, Outcome indicators, Rheumatic valve surgery, Volume–outcome relationship",
author = "Russell, {E. Anne} and Baker, {Robert A.} and Bennetts, {Jayme S.} and Alex Brown and Reid, {Christopher M.} and Robert Tam and Lavinia Tran and Walsh, {Warren F.} and Maguire, {Graeme P.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.179",
language = "English",
volume = "221",
pages = "144--151",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Case load and valve surgery outcome in Australia. / Russell, E. Anne; Baker, Robert A.; Bennetts, Jayme S.; Brown, Alex; Reid, Christopher M.; Tam, Robert; Tran, Lavinia; Walsh, Warren F.; Maguire, Graeme P.

In: International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 221, 15.10.2016, p. 144-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case load and valve surgery outcome in Australia

AU - Russell, E. Anne

AU - Baker, Robert A.

AU - Bennetts, Jayme S.

AU - Brown, Alex

AU - Reid, Christopher M.

AU - Tam, Robert

AU - Tran, Lavinia

AU - Walsh, Warren F.

AU - Maguire, Graeme P.

PY - 2016/10/15

Y1 - 2016/10/15

N2 - Background In Australia it has been suggested that heart valve surgery, particularly for rheumatic heart disease (RHD), should be consolidated in higher volume centres. International studies of cardiac surgery suggest large volume centres have superior outcomes. However the effect of site and surgeon case load on longer term outcomes for valve surgery has not been investigated. Methods The Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database was analysed. The adjusted association between both average annual site and surgeon case load on short term complications and short and long-term survival was determined. Results Outcomes associated with 20,116 valve procedures at 25 surgical sites and by 93 surgeons were analysed. Overall adjusted analysis showed increasing site and surgeon case load was associated with longer ventilation, less reoperation and more anticoagulant complications. Increasing surgeon case load was also associated with less acute kidney injury. Adjusted 30-day mortality was not associated with site or surgeon case load. There was no consistent relationship between increasing site case load and long term survival. The association between surgeon case load and outcome demonstrated poorer adjusted survival in the highest volume surgeon group. Conclusions In this Australian study, the adjusted association between surgeon and site case load was not simple or consistent. Overall larger volume sites or surgeons did not have superior outcomes. Mandating a particular site case load level for valve surgery or a minimum number of procedures for individual surgeons, in an Australian context, cannot be supported by these findings.

AB - Background In Australia it has been suggested that heart valve surgery, particularly for rheumatic heart disease (RHD), should be consolidated in higher volume centres. International studies of cardiac surgery suggest large volume centres have superior outcomes. However the effect of site and surgeon case load on longer term outcomes for valve surgery has not been investigated. Methods The Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database was analysed. The adjusted association between both average annual site and surgeon case load on short term complications and short and long-term survival was determined. Results Outcomes associated with 20,116 valve procedures at 25 surgical sites and by 93 surgeons were analysed. Overall adjusted analysis showed increasing site and surgeon case load was associated with longer ventilation, less reoperation and more anticoagulant complications. Increasing surgeon case load was also associated with less acute kidney injury. Adjusted 30-day mortality was not associated with site or surgeon case load. There was no consistent relationship between increasing site case load and long term survival. The association between surgeon case load and outcome demonstrated poorer adjusted survival in the highest volume surgeon group. Conclusions In this Australian study, the adjusted association between surgeon and site case load was not simple or consistent. Overall larger volume sites or surgeons did not have superior outcomes. Mandating a particular site case load level for valve surgery or a minimum number of procedures for individual surgeons, in an Australian context, cannot be supported by these findings.

KW - Cardiac surgery

KW - Hospital performance

KW - Indigenous health

KW - Outcome indicators

KW - Rheumatic valve surgery

KW - Volume–outcome relationship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978036231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.179

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.179

M3 - Article

VL - 221

SP - 144

EP - 151

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

ER -