Abstract
Benefit–cost analyses in public health typically calculate the benefits of mortality reduction interventions by multiplying the Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) and the expected decrease in fatalities. This procedure approximates the benefits of small mortality changes but is inaccurate for large risk changes because it holds constant the VSL—a marginal rate of substitution. Building on the theoretical framework of the VSL, we derive expressions to calculate the benefits of non-marginal mortality reductions with empirically calibrated compensating variations and illustrate their use.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 111673 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Economics Letters |
| Volume | 237 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Benefit–cost analysis
- Mortality risk
- Value of a statistical life
- VSL
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver