Building Theory at the Intersection of Ecological Sustainability and Strategic Management

Helen Borland, Véronique Ambrosini, Adam Lindgreen, Joëlle Vanhamme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article builds theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management literature—specifically, in relation to dynamic capabilities literature. By combining industrial organization economics–based, resource-based, and dynamic capability–based views, it is possible to develop a better understanding of the strategies that businesses may follow, depending on their managers’ assumptions about ecological sustainability. To develop innovative strategies for ecological sustainability, the dynamic capabilities framework needs to be extended. In particular, the sensing–seizing–maintaining competitiveness framework should operate not only within the boundaries of a business ecosystem but in relation to global biophysical ecosystems; in addition, two more dynamic capabilities should be added, namely, remapping and reaping. This framework can explicate core managerial beliefs about ecological sustainability. Finally, this approach offers opportunities for managers and academics to identify, categorize, and exploit business strategies for ecological sustainability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-307
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume135
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Dynamic capabilities
  • Ecocentrism
  • Ecological sustainability
  • Transformational business strategy

Cite this

Borland, Helen ; Ambrosini, Véronique ; Lindgreen, Adam ; Vanhamme, Joëlle. / Building Theory at the Intersection of Ecological Sustainability and Strategic Management. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2016 ; Vol. 135, No. 2. pp. 293-307.
@article{46b8f97500284a9085d34d0d0c6a6591,
title = "Building Theory at the Intersection of Ecological Sustainability and Strategic Management",
abstract = "This article builds theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management literature—specifically, in relation to dynamic capabilities literature. By combining industrial organization economics–based, resource-based, and dynamic capability–based views, it is possible to develop a better understanding of the strategies that businesses may follow, depending on their managers’ assumptions about ecological sustainability. To develop innovative strategies for ecological sustainability, the dynamic capabilities framework needs to be extended. In particular, the sensing–seizing–maintaining competitiveness framework should operate not only within the boundaries of a business ecosystem but in relation to global biophysical ecosystems; in addition, two more dynamic capabilities should be added, namely, remapping and reaping. This framework can explicate core managerial beliefs about ecological sustainability. Finally, this approach offers opportunities for managers and academics to identify, categorize, and exploit business strategies for ecological sustainability.",
keywords = "Dynamic capabilities, Ecocentrism, Ecological sustainability, Transformational business strategy",
author = "Helen Borland and V{\'e}ronique Ambrosini and Adam Lindgreen and Jo{\"e}lle Vanhamme",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-014-2471-6",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
pages = "293--307",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Building Theory at the Intersection of Ecological Sustainability and Strategic Management. / Borland, Helen; Ambrosini, Véronique; Lindgreen, Adam; Vanhamme, Joëlle.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 135, No. 2, 2016, p. 293-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building Theory at the Intersection of Ecological Sustainability and Strategic Management

AU - Borland, Helen

AU - Ambrosini, Véronique

AU - Lindgreen, Adam

AU - Vanhamme, Joëlle

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article builds theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management literature—specifically, in relation to dynamic capabilities literature. By combining industrial organization economics–based, resource-based, and dynamic capability–based views, it is possible to develop a better understanding of the strategies that businesses may follow, depending on their managers’ assumptions about ecological sustainability. To develop innovative strategies for ecological sustainability, the dynamic capabilities framework needs to be extended. In particular, the sensing–seizing–maintaining competitiveness framework should operate not only within the boundaries of a business ecosystem but in relation to global biophysical ecosystems; in addition, two more dynamic capabilities should be added, namely, remapping and reaping. This framework can explicate core managerial beliefs about ecological sustainability. Finally, this approach offers opportunities for managers and academics to identify, categorize, and exploit business strategies for ecological sustainability.

AB - This article builds theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management literature—specifically, in relation to dynamic capabilities literature. By combining industrial organization economics–based, resource-based, and dynamic capability–based views, it is possible to develop a better understanding of the strategies that businesses may follow, depending on their managers’ assumptions about ecological sustainability. To develop innovative strategies for ecological sustainability, the dynamic capabilities framework needs to be extended. In particular, the sensing–seizing–maintaining competitiveness framework should operate not only within the boundaries of a business ecosystem but in relation to global biophysical ecosystems; in addition, two more dynamic capabilities should be added, namely, remapping and reaping. This framework can explicate core managerial beliefs about ecological sustainability. Finally, this approach offers opportunities for managers and academics to identify, categorize, and exploit business strategies for ecological sustainability.

KW - Dynamic capabilities

KW - Ecocentrism

KW - Ecological sustainability

KW - Transformational business strategy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912570398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-014-2471-6

DO - 10.1007/s10551-014-2471-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84912570398

VL - 135

SP - 293

EP - 307

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 2

ER -