TY - JOUR
T1 - Building the evidence for integrated care for type 2 diabetes
T2 - A pilot study
AU - Browne, Jessica L.
AU - Speight, Jane
AU - Martin, Carina
AU - Gilfillan, Christopher
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Integrated care models have the potential to reduce fragmentation in the health system and improve outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes. A pilot evaluation of an integrated care model for people with type 2 diabetes in Melbourne, Australia, is reported on. Two studies were conducted: (1) a 6-month pilot randomised controlled trial (n≤56) evaluating the impact of the integrated care model relative to hospital outpatient clinics; and (2) a cross-sectional study (n≤92) of patients attending the two services. The primary outcome was diabetes-specific distress; secondary outcomes were perceived quality of diabetes care, diabetes-specific self-efficacy and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). There was no effect of service setting on diabetes-specific distress. Participants from the integrated care setting perceived the quality of diabetes care to be higher than did participants from the hospital clinics. Significant HbA1c improvements were observed over time, but with no effect of service setting. The model holds promise for people with type 2 diabetes who need more specialist/multidisciplinary care than can be provided in primary care. Patients' evaluations of the quality of diabetes care received at the integrated care service are very positive, which is likely to be one of the key strengths of the integrated model.
AB - Integrated care models have the potential to reduce fragmentation in the health system and improve outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes. A pilot evaluation of an integrated care model for people with type 2 diabetes in Melbourne, Australia, is reported on. Two studies were conducted: (1) a 6-month pilot randomised controlled trial (n≤56) evaluating the impact of the integrated care model relative to hospital outpatient clinics; and (2) a cross-sectional study (n≤92) of patients attending the two services. The primary outcome was diabetes-specific distress; secondary outcomes were perceived quality of diabetes care, diabetes-specific self-efficacy and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). There was no effect of service setting on diabetes-specific distress. Participants from the integrated care setting perceived the quality of diabetes care to be higher than did participants from the hospital clinics. Significant HbA1c improvements were observed over time, but with no effect of service setting. The model holds promise for people with type 2 diabetes who need more specialist/multidisciplinary care than can be provided in primary care. Patients' evaluations of the quality of diabetes care received at the integrated care service are very positive, which is likely to be one of the key strengths of the integrated model.
KW - patient satisfaction
KW - quality of care
KW - questionnaire
KW - randomised controlled trial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992163154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1071/PY15020
DO - 10.1071/PY15020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84992163154
VL - 22
SP - 409
EP - 415
JO - Australian Journal of Primary Health
JF - Australian Journal of Primary Health
SN - 1448-7527
IS - 5
ER -