Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale

Dirk S Schmeller, Monika Böhm, Christos Arvanitidis, Shannon Barber-Meyer, Neil Brummitt, Mark Chandler, Eva Chatzinikolaou, Mark J. Costello, Hui Ding, Jaime García-Moreno, Mike Gill, Peter Haase, Miranda Jones, Romain Juillard, William Ernest Magnusson, Corinne S. Martin, Melodie McGeoch, Jean-Baptiste Mihoub, Nathalie Pettorelli, Vânia Proença & 8 others Cui Peng, Eugenie Regan, Ute Schmiedel, John P Simaika, Lauren Weatherdon, Carly Waterman, Haigen Xu, Jayne Belnap

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Human-driven global change is causing ongoing declines in biodiversity worldwide. In order to address these declines, decision-makers need accurate assessments of the status of and pressures on biodiversity. However, these are heavily constrained by incomplete and uneven spatial, temporal and taxonomic coverage. For instance, data from regions such as Europe and North America are currently used overwhelmingly for large-scale biodiversity assessments due to lesser availability of suitable data from other, more biodiversity-rich, regions. These data-poor regions are often those experiencing the strongest threats to biodiversity, however. There is therefore an urgent need to fill the existing gaps in global biodiversity monitoring. Here, we review current knowledge on best practice in capacity building for biodiversity monitoring and provide an overview of existing means to improve biodiversity data collection considering the different types of biodiversity monitoring data. Our review comprises insights from work in Africa, South America, Polar Regions and Europe; in government-funded, volunteer and citizen-based monitoring in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. The key steps to effectively building capacity in biodiversity monitoring are: identifying monitoring questions and aims; identifying the key components, functions, and processes to monitor; identifying the most suitable monitoring methods for these elements, carrying out monitoring activities; managing the resultant data; and interpreting monitoring data. Additionally, biodiversity monitoring should use multiple approaches including extensive and intensive monitoring through volunteers and professional scientists but also harnessing new technologies. Finally, we call on the scientific community to share biodiversity monitoring data, knowledge and tools to ensure the accessibility, interoperability, and reporting of biodiversity data at a global scale.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2765–2790
Number of pages26
JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Biodiversity monitoring
  • Citizen science
  • New technologies
  • Paraecologists
  • Remote sensing

Cite this

Schmeller, D. S., Böhm, M., Arvanitidis, C., Barber-Meyer, S., Brummitt, N., Chandler, M., ... Belnap, J. (2017). Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12), 2765–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7
Schmeller, Dirk S ; Böhm, Monika ; Arvanitidis, Christos ; Barber-Meyer, Shannon ; Brummitt, Neil ; Chandler, Mark ; Chatzinikolaou, Eva ; Costello, Mark J. ; Ding, Hui ; García-Moreno, Jaime ; Gill, Mike ; Haase, Peter ; Jones, Miranda ; Juillard, Romain ; Magnusson, William Ernest ; Martin, Corinne S. ; McGeoch, Melodie ; Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste ; Pettorelli, Nathalie ; Proença, Vânia ; Peng, Cui ; Regan, Eugenie ; Schmiedel, Ute ; Simaika, John P ; Weatherdon, Lauren ; Waterman, Carly ; Xu, Haigen ; Belnap, Jayne. / Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale. In: Biodiversity and Conservation. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 12. pp. 2765–2790.
@article{e42586365a2746e3a1f5124a7621aada,
title = "Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale",
abstract = "Human-driven global change is causing ongoing declines in biodiversity worldwide. In order to address these declines, decision-makers need accurate assessments of the status of and pressures on biodiversity. However, these are heavily constrained by incomplete and uneven spatial, temporal and taxonomic coverage. For instance, data from regions such as Europe and North America are currently used overwhelmingly for large-scale biodiversity assessments due to lesser availability of suitable data from other, more biodiversity-rich, regions. These data-poor regions are often those experiencing the strongest threats to biodiversity, however. There is therefore an urgent need to fill the existing gaps in global biodiversity monitoring. Here, we review current knowledge on best practice in capacity building for biodiversity monitoring and provide an overview of existing means to improve biodiversity data collection considering the different types of biodiversity monitoring data. Our review comprises insights from work in Africa, South America, Polar Regions and Europe; in government-funded, volunteer and citizen-based monitoring in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. The key steps to effectively building capacity in biodiversity monitoring are: identifying monitoring questions and aims; identifying the key components, functions, and processes to monitor; identifying the most suitable monitoring methods for these elements, carrying out monitoring activities; managing the resultant data; and interpreting monitoring data. Additionally, biodiversity monitoring should use multiple approaches including extensive and intensive monitoring through volunteers and professional scientists but also harnessing new technologies. Finally, we call on the scientific community to share biodiversity monitoring data, knowledge and tools to ensure the accessibility, interoperability, and reporting of biodiversity data at a global scale.",
keywords = "Biodiversity monitoring, Citizen science, New technologies, Paraecologists, Remote sensing",
author = "Schmeller, {Dirk S} and Monika B{\"o}hm and Christos Arvanitidis and Shannon Barber-Meyer and Neil Brummitt and Mark Chandler and Eva Chatzinikolaou and Costello, {Mark J.} and Hui Ding and Jaime Garc{\'i}a-Moreno and Mike Gill and Peter Haase and Miranda Jones and Romain Juillard and Magnusson, {William Ernest} and Martin, {Corinne S.} and Melodie McGeoch and Jean-Baptiste Mihoub and Nathalie Pettorelli and V{\^a}nia Proen{\cc}a and Cui Peng and Eugenie Regan and Ute Schmiedel and Simaika, {John P} and Lauren Weatherdon and Carly Waterman and Haigen Xu and Jayne Belnap",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "2765–2790",
journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
issn = "0960-3115",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

Schmeller, DS, Böhm, M, Arvanitidis, C, Barber-Meyer, S, Brummitt, N, Chandler, M, Chatzinikolaou, E, Costello, MJ, Ding, H, García-Moreno, J, Gill, M, Haase, P, Jones, M, Juillard, R, Magnusson, WE, Martin, CS, McGeoch, M, Mihoub, J-B, Pettorelli, N, Proença, V, Peng, C, Regan, E, Schmiedel, U, Simaika, JP, Weatherdon, L, Waterman, C, Xu, H & Belnap, J 2017, 'Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale' Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2765–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7

Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale. / Schmeller, Dirk S; Böhm, Monika; Arvanitidis, Christos; Barber-Meyer, Shannon; Brummitt, Neil; Chandler, Mark; Chatzinikolaou, Eva; Costello, Mark J.; Ding, Hui; García-Moreno, Jaime; Gill, Mike; Haase, Peter; Jones, Miranda; Juillard, Romain; Magnusson, William Ernest; Martin, Corinne S.; McGeoch, Melodie; Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste; Pettorelli, Nathalie; Proença, Vânia; Peng, Cui; Regan, Eugenie; Schmiedel, Ute; Simaika, John P; Weatherdon, Lauren; Waterman, Carly; Xu, Haigen; Belnap, Jayne.

In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 26, No. 12, 20.06.2017, p. 2765–2790.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale

AU - Schmeller, Dirk S

AU - Böhm, Monika

AU - Arvanitidis, Christos

AU - Barber-Meyer, Shannon

AU - Brummitt, Neil

AU - Chandler, Mark

AU - Chatzinikolaou, Eva

AU - Costello, Mark J.

AU - Ding, Hui

AU - García-Moreno, Jaime

AU - Gill, Mike

AU - Haase, Peter

AU - Jones, Miranda

AU - Juillard, Romain

AU - Magnusson, William Ernest

AU - Martin, Corinne S.

AU - McGeoch, Melodie

AU - Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste

AU - Pettorelli, Nathalie

AU - Proença, Vânia

AU - Peng, Cui

AU - Regan, Eugenie

AU - Schmiedel, Ute

AU - Simaika, John P

AU - Weatherdon, Lauren

AU - Waterman, Carly

AU - Xu, Haigen

AU - Belnap, Jayne

PY - 2017/6/20

Y1 - 2017/6/20

N2 - Human-driven global change is causing ongoing declines in biodiversity worldwide. In order to address these declines, decision-makers need accurate assessments of the status of and pressures on biodiversity. However, these are heavily constrained by incomplete and uneven spatial, temporal and taxonomic coverage. For instance, data from regions such as Europe and North America are currently used overwhelmingly for large-scale biodiversity assessments due to lesser availability of suitable data from other, more biodiversity-rich, regions. These data-poor regions are often those experiencing the strongest threats to biodiversity, however. There is therefore an urgent need to fill the existing gaps in global biodiversity monitoring. Here, we review current knowledge on best practice in capacity building for biodiversity monitoring and provide an overview of existing means to improve biodiversity data collection considering the different types of biodiversity monitoring data. Our review comprises insights from work in Africa, South America, Polar Regions and Europe; in government-funded, volunteer and citizen-based monitoring in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. The key steps to effectively building capacity in biodiversity monitoring are: identifying monitoring questions and aims; identifying the key components, functions, and processes to monitor; identifying the most suitable monitoring methods for these elements, carrying out monitoring activities; managing the resultant data; and interpreting monitoring data. Additionally, biodiversity monitoring should use multiple approaches including extensive and intensive monitoring through volunteers and professional scientists but also harnessing new technologies. Finally, we call on the scientific community to share biodiversity monitoring data, knowledge and tools to ensure the accessibility, interoperability, and reporting of biodiversity data at a global scale.

AB - Human-driven global change is causing ongoing declines in biodiversity worldwide. In order to address these declines, decision-makers need accurate assessments of the status of and pressures on biodiversity. However, these are heavily constrained by incomplete and uneven spatial, temporal and taxonomic coverage. For instance, data from regions such as Europe and North America are currently used overwhelmingly for large-scale biodiversity assessments due to lesser availability of suitable data from other, more biodiversity-rich, regions. These data-poor regions are often those experiencing the strongest threats to biodiversity, however. There is therefore an urgent need to fill the existing gaps in global biodiversity monitoring. Here, we review current knowledge on best practice in capacity building for biodiversity monitoring and provide an overview of existing means to improve biodiversity data collection considering the different types of biodiversity monitoring data. Our review comprises insights from work in Africa, South America, Polar Regions and Europe; in government-funded, volunteer and citizen-based monitoring in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. The key steps to effectively building capacity in biodiversity monitoring are: identifying monitoring questions and aims; identifying the key components, functions, and processes to monitor; identifying the most suitable monitoring methods for these elements, carrying out monitoring activities; managing the resultant data; and interpreting monitoring data. Additionally, biodiversity monitoring should use multiple approaches including extensive and intensive monitoring through volunteers and professional scientists but also harnessing new technologies. Finally, we call on the scientific community to share biodiversity monitoring data, knowledge and tools to ensure the accessibility, interoperability, and reporting of biodiversity data at a global scale.

KW - Biodiversity monitoring

KW - Citizen science

KW - New technologies

KW - Paraecologists

KW - Remote sensing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021143065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7

DO - 10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7

M3 - Review Article

VL - 26

SP - 2765

EP - 2790

JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

SN - 0960-3115

IS - 12

ER -

Schmeller DS, Böhm M, Arvanitidis C, Barber-Meyer S, Brummitt N, Chandler M et al. Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2017 Jun 20;26(12):2765–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7