TY - JOUR
T1 - Broken Machines or Active Bodies? Part 2. How People Talk About Osteoarthritis and Why Clinicians Need to Change the Conversation
AU - Bunzli, Samantha
AU - Taylor, Nicholas F.
AU - O'Brien, Penny
AU - Wallis, Jason A.
AU - Caneiro, J. P.
AU - Woodward-Kron, Robyn
AU - Hunter, David J.
AU - Choong, Peter F.
AU - Dowsey, Michelle M.
AU - Shields, Nora
N1 - Funding Information:
1School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia. 2Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia. 3School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia. 5Department of Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 6Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia. 7School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 8School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 9Body Logic Physiotherapy, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 10Department of Medical Education, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 11Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Arabanoo Precinct, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2065 NSW, Australia. 12Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia. 13Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. 14Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University. This editorial is based on the findings from a systematic review and published qualitative literature, and did not involve the participation of study subjects. Therefore, no institutional review board or ethics committee approval was required. Research reported in this publication was funded and supported through the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Total Joint Replacement (APP1116235), awarded to the Department of Surgery at St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne. M.M.D. is supported by a University of Melbourne Dame Kate Campbell Fellowship, and P.F.C. is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellowship (APP1154203). D.J.H. is supported by an NHMRC Investigator Grant Leadership 2 (APP1194737). The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or financial involvement in any organization or entity with a direct financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in the article. Address correspondence to Dr Samantha Bunzli, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] U Copyright ©2023 JOSPT ®, Inc
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Movement Science Media. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - SYNOPSIS: How people talk about osteoarthritis may impact outcomes, including uptake of guideline recommendations related to activity-based lifestyles and interventions. In this editorial, we describe 2 key ways of talking, based on findings from our systematic review of 62 qualitative studies exploring the perceptions of people with knee osteoarthritis (n = 1208), their carers (n = 28), and clinicians (n = 2403). Among raw quotes extracted from the studies, we observed a dominant impairment-based way of talking and a participatory based way of talking. These ways of talking form a novel framework to help clinicians understand what people think and do about osteoarthritis.
AB - SYNOPSIS: How people talk about osteoarthritis may impact outcomes, including uptake of guideline recommendations related to activity-based lifestyles and interventions. In this editorial, we describe 2 key ways of talking, based on findings from our systematic review of 62 qualitative studies exploring the perceptions of people with knee osteoarthritis (n = 1208), their carers (n = 28), and clinicians (n = 2403). Among raw quotes extracted from the studies, we observed a dominant impairment-based way of talking and a participatory based way of talking. These ways of talking form a novel framework to help clinicians understand what people think and do about osteoarthritis.
KW - communication
KW - discourse
KW - osteoarthritis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85160680343
U2 - 10.2519/jospt.2023.11880
DO - 10.2519/jospt.2023.11880
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 37259542
AN - SCOPUS:85160680343
SN - 0190-6011
VL - 53
SP - 325
EP - 330
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
IS - 6
ER -