Breathing life into law: what it means to take an ethics+ approach to conceptualising law in research governance

Calvin Wai-Loon Ho, Justin Yuk Cheong Wong

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

Abstract

The lived experience of law in medical practice and research is typified by intricate, sometimes complex and often mundane (perhaps even ritualistic) procedural requirements. While some scholars have been content thus to limit the normativity of law, Graeme reminds us that law is interconnected with ethics and that its distinctiveness may be better understood as process, particularly in boundary or liminal spaces where the roles of ethics and law are blurred. This processual conception of law is in turn a component of governance regimes that he depicts as ‘Ethics+’. He argues that ethics is always a necessary component of a robust and defensible regime of health research that is rooted in the core values and principles at stake while concurrently enabling adaptation and accommodation. Law as an ‘Ethics+’ governance regime embraces uncertainty and the liminal nature of the health research journey, while admitting value-based objectives that can act as foci for stakeholders. The chapter shows the bright beacon dimension of Graeme’s legacy, which points the way to a rich, non-formalistic account of law – not simply as law in action or law on the books but as law subsisting in-between.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLaw and Legacy in Medical Jurisprudence
Subtitle of host publicationEssays in Honour of Graeme Laurie
EditorsEdward S. Dove, Niamh Nic Shuibhne
Place of PublicationCambridge UK
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter7
Pages149-166
Number of pages18
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781108903295
ISBN (Print)9781108828895, 9781108842433
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Governance
  • ethics+
  • research governance
  • processual
  • big data
  • artificial intelligence
  • liminal
  • biobank
  • relationality
  • ethics review

Cite this