Boundary crossing innovations

Case studies from the energy domain

R. P.J.M. Raven, G. P.J. Verbong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we investigate, using a multi-level perspective, how innovations can change the relation between multiple socio-technical systems. We analyze two Dutch cases: the use of biomass in the waste and the electricity regime, and CHP in relation to the natural gas and electricity regime to explore boundary crossing dynamics. We conclude that these dynamics radically changed the way the regimes relate from almost no relation to a much more symbiotic and even integrative relation. We also find a pattern where the presence of more than one regime seems to offer extra opportunities during the early phase, but creates barriers further along the innovation path. Additionally, we introduce a typology for investigating and understanding boundary crossing innovations. Policy consequences of border crossing dynamics are still far from developed; connecting disconnected policy arenas might be the most important challenge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-93
Number of pages9
JournalTechnology in Society
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biomass
  • Boundaries
  • CHP
  • System innovation
  • Transition

Cite this

@article{a942d8f76c584a6496a6453962bff56d,
title = "Boundary crossing innovations: Case studies from the energy domain",
abstract = "In this paper we investigate, using a multi-level perspective, how innovations can change the relation between multiple socio-technical systems. We analyze two Dutch cases: the use of biomass in the waste and the electricity regime, and CHP in relation to the natural gas and electricity regime to explore boundary crossing dynamics. We conclude that these dynamics radically changed the way the regimes relate from almost no relation to a much more symbiotic and even integrative relation. We also find a pattern where the presence of more than one regime seems to offer extra opportunities during the early phase, but creates barriers further along the innovation path. Additionally, we introduce a typology for investigating and understanding boundary crossing innovations. Policy consequences of border crossing dynamics are still far from developed; connecting disconnected policy arenas might be the most important challenge.",
keywords = "Biomass, Boundaries, CHP, System innovation, Transition",
author = "Raven, {R. P.J.M.} and Verbong, {G. P.J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.006",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "85--93",
journal = "Technology in Society",
issn = "0160-791X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Boundary crossing innovations : Case studies from the energy domain. / Raven, R. P.J.M.; Verbong, G. P.J.

In: Technology in Society, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.02.2009, p. 85-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boundary crossing innovations

T2 - Case studies from the energy domain

AU - Raven, R. P.J.M.

AU - Verbong, G. P.J.

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - In this paper we investigate, using a multi-level perspective, how innovations can change the relation between multiple socio-technical systems. We analyze two Dutch cases: the use of biomass in the waste and the electricity regime, and CHP in relation to the natural gas and electricity regime to explore boundary crossing dynamics. We conclude that these dynamics radically changed the way the regimes relate from almost no relation to a much more symbiotic and even integrative relation. We also find a pattern where the presence of more than one regime seems to offer extra opportunities during the early phase, but creates barriers further along the innovation path. Additionally, we introduce a typology for investigating and understanding boundary crossing innovations. Policy consequences of border crossing dynamics are still far from developed; connecting disconnected policy arenas might be the most important challenge.

AB - In this paper we investigate, using a multi-level perspective, how innovations can change the relation between multiple socio-technical systems. We analyze two Dutch cases: the use of biomass in the waste and the electricity regime, and CHP in relation to the natural gas and electricity regime to explore boundary crossing dynamics. We conclude that these dynamics radically changed the way the regimes relate from almost no relation to a much more symbiotic and even integrative relation. We also find a pattern where the presence of more than one regime seems to offer extra opportunities during the early phase, but creates barriers further along the innovation path. Additionally, we introduce a typology for investigating and understanding boundary crossing innovations. Policy consequences of border crossing dynamics are still far from developed; connecting disconnected policy arenas might be the most important challenge.

KW - Biomass

KW - Boundaries

KW - CHP

KW - System innovation

KW - Transition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59749089094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.006

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 85

EP - 93

JO - Technology in Society

JF - Technology in Society

SN - 0160-791X

IS - 1

ER -