Abstract
This paper questions the view that knowledge must be articulable or at least experiential. It asserts that what distinguishes habitual yet intentional action from a mechanistic response is its grounding in a suitable claim to knowledge. However, it denies that a necessary condition for knowing how to perform an action is the ability of the subject to either articulate the particulars of that act, or experience it as appropriate.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 37-54 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Philosophical Explorations |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2004 |
Externally published | Yes |