Board independence and internal control weakness

Evidence from SOX 404 disclosures

Yangyang Chen, W Robert Knechel, Vijaya Bhaskar Marisetty, Cameron Truong, Madhu Veeraraghavan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate whether board independence has an impact on the likelihood that a company reports weaknesses in internal controls. Using a sample of 11,226 firm-year observations spanning the period 2004–2012, we establish several findings. First, we document a negative relation between board independence and the disclosure of internal control weaknesses. We also document that the negative relation is stronger for firms with unitary leadership (combined positions of CEO and chairman) than for firms with dual leadership. Next, we show that board independence is associated with both fewer account-specific and companylevel weaknesses. Finally, we show that board independence is associated with timely remediation of internal control weaknesses and that the implementation of Auditing Standard No. 5 in 2007 weakens the effect of board independence on the disclosure of ICW.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-62
Number of pages18
JournalAuditing
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Keywords

  • Board independence
  • Internal control weakness
  • SOX 404
  • Unitary versus dual leadership

Cite this

Chen, Yangyang ; Knechel, W Robert ; Marisetty, Vijaya Bhaskar ; Truong, Cameron ; Veeraraghavan, Madhu. / Board independence and internal control weakness : Evidence from SOX 404 disclosures. In: Auditing. 2017 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 45-62.
@article{1cbb081c0fa845718dcf191552d0bf17,
title = "Board independence and internal control weakness: Evidence from SOX 404 disclosures",
abstract = "In this paper, we investigate whether board independence has an impact on the likelihood that a company reports weaknesses in internal controls. Using a sample of 11,226 firm-year observations spanning the period 2004–2012, we establish several findings. First, we document a negative relation between board independence and the disclosure of internal control weaknesses. We also document that the negative relation is stronger for firms with unitary leadership (combined positions of CEO and chairman) than for firms with dual leadership. Next, we show that board independence is associated with both fewer account-specific and companylevel weaknesses. Finally, we show that board independence is associated with timely remediation of internal control weaknesses and that the implementation of Auditing Standard No. 5 in 2007 weakens the effect of board independence on the disclosure of ICW.",
keywords = "Board independence, Internal control weakness, SOX 404, Unitary versus dual leadership",
author = "Yangyang Chen and Knechel, {W Robert} and Marisetty, {Vijaya Bhaskar} and Cameron Truong and Madhu Veeraraghavan",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2308/ajpt-51577",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "45--62",
journal = "Auditing",
issn = "0278-0380",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "2",

}

Chen, Y, Knechel, WR, Marisetty, VB, Truong, C & Veeraraghavan, M 2017, 'Board independence and internal control weakness: Evidence from SOX 404 disclosures', Auditing, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 45-62. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51577

Board independence and internal control weakness : Evidence from SOX 404 disclosures. / Chen, Yangyang; Knechel, W Robert; Marisetty, Vijaya Bhaskar; Truong, Cameron; Veeraraghavan, Madhu.

In: Auditing, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.05.2017, p. 45-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Board independence and internal control weakness

T2 - Evidence from SOX 404 disclosures

AU - Chen, Yangyang

AU - Knechel, W Robert

AU - Marisetty, Vijaya Bhaskar

AU - Truong, Cameron

AU - Veeraraghavan, Madhu

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - In this paper, we investigate whether board independence has an impact on the likelihood that a company reports weaknesses in internal controls. Using a sample of 11,226 firm-year observations spanning the period 2004–2012, we establish several findings. First, we document a negative relation between board independence and the disclosure of internal control weaknesses. We also document that the negative relation is stronger for firms with unitary leadership (combined positions of CEO and chairman) than for firms with dual leadership. Next, we show that board independence is associated with both fewer account-specific and companylevel weaknesses. Finally, we show that board independence is associated with timely remediation of internal control weaknesses and that the implementation of Auditing Standard No. 5 in 2007 weakens the effect of board independence on the disclosure of ICW.

AB - In this paper, we investigate whether board independence has an impact on the likelihood that a company reports weaknesses in internal controls. Using a sample of 11,226 firm-year observations spanning the period 2004–2012, we establish several findings. First, we document a negative relation between board independence and the disclosure of internal control weaknesses. We also document that the negative relation is stronger for firms with unitary leadership (combined positions of CEO and chairman) than for firms with dual leadership. Next, we show that board independence is associated with both fewer account-specific and companylevel weaknesses. Finally, we show that board independence is associated with timely remediation of internal control weaknesses and that the implementation of Auditing Standard No. 5 in 2007 weakens the effect of board independence on the disclosure of ICW.

KW - Board independence

KW - Internal control weakness

KW - SOX 404

KW - Unitary versus dual leadership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018807828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/ajpt-51577

DO - 10.2308/ajpt-51577

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 45

EP - 62

JO - Auditing

JF - Auditing

SN - 0278-0380

IS - 2

ER -