Blurring

An approach to conflation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I consider the phenomenon of conflation-treating distinct things as one-and develop logical tools for modeling it. These tools involve a purely consequence-theoretic treatment, independent of any proof or model theory, as well as a four-valued valuational treatment

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-188
Number of pages18
JournalNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Blurring
  • Conflation
  • Confusion
  • Tetravaluations

Cite this

@article{490fc9dac60f4ddb87a70628292acaa2,
title = "Blurring: An approach to conflation",
abstract = "I consider the phenomenon of conflation-treating distinct things as one-and develop logical tools for modeling it. These tools involve a purely consequence-theoretic treatment, independent of any proof or model theory, as well as a four-valued valuational treatment",
keywords = "Blurring, Conflation, Confusion, Tetravaluations",
author = "David Ripley",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1215/00294527-2017-0025",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "171--188",
journal = "Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic",
issn = "0029-4527",
publisher = "University of Notre Dame",
number = "2",

}

Blurring : An approach to conflation. / Ripley, David.

In: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2018, p. 171-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blurring

T2 - An approach to conflation

AU - Ripley, David

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - I consider the phenomenon of conflation-treating distinct things as one-and develop logical tools for modeling it. These tools involve a purely consequence-theoretic treatment, independent of any proof or model theory, as well as a four-valued valuational treatment

AB - I consider the phenomenon of conflation-treating distinct things as one-and develop logical tools for modeling it. These tools involve a purely consequence-theoretic treatment, independent of any proof or model theory, as well as a four-valued valuational treatment

KW - Blurring

KW - Conflation

KW - Confusion

KW - Tetravaluations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044838724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/00294527-2017-0025

DO - 10.1215/00294527-2017-0025

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 171

EP - 188

JO - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

JF - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

SN - 0029-4527

IS - 2

ER -