Blended Learning 3.0: Getting students on board

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that smart technologies offer exciting potential for university teaching and learning. In this brave new world, educators are urged to discard traditional teaching methods, such as the lecture, and re-place them with student-centred modes that incorporate digital technology, self- and peer-based teaching and online content. In the communications and media studies discipline, many educators have been incorporating new technology for 10 years or more. However, we tend to use technology to enhance existing material and methods: effectively, we are still using the lecture-tutorial teaching model of last century. We are approaching the third decade of the 21st century, yet research shows that real technology-driven change to teaching methods has been slow to develop. This is for many reasons, including institutional lag in providing access to cutting-edge software and networks. More often cited is educators’ resistance, particularly in light of surveys in which students express dissatisfaction when blended or flipped classroom methods are introduced. I contend that the main reason for this dissatisfaction is about training: not of university staff, but of stu-dents, who we expect to automatically accept major changes to the way most have always been taught and assessed, without adequate explanation. Student training is part of what I see as the move to ‘blended learning 3.0’, in which we reassess what has worked and what has failed, on the way to revolutionising the way educators teach and students learn in 21st-century smart universities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSmart Education and e-Learning 2018
EditorsV. Uskov, R. J. Howlett, L. C. Jain, L. Vlacic
PublisherSpringer
Pages214-223
Number of pages9
Volume99
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-92363-5
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-92363-5
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Publication series

NameSmart Innovation, Systems and Technologies

Keywords

  • Blended learning in higher education
  • Technology in higher education

Cite this

Dann, C. E. (2019). Blended Learning 3.0: Getting students on board. In V. Uskov, R. J. Howlett, L. C. Jain, & L. Vlacic (Eds.), Smart Education and e-Learning 2018 (1 ed., Vol. 99, pp. 214-223). (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies). Springer.
Dann, Caron Elizabeth. / Blended Learning 3.0: Getting students on board. Smart Education and e-Learning 2018. editor / V. Uskov ; R. J. Howlett ; L. C. Jain ; L. Vlacic. Vol. 99 1. ed. Springer, 2019. pp. 214-223 (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies).
@inbook{2d63d2161c9c4379b4d097327c007b69,
title = "Blended Learning 3.0: Getting students on board",
abstract = "It is widely acknowledged that smart technologies offer exciting potential for university teaching and learning. In this brave new world, educators are urged to discard traditional teaching methods, such as the lecture, and re-place them with student-centred modes that incorporate digital technology, self- and peer-based teaching and online content. In the communications and media studies discipline, many educators have been incorporating new technology for 10 years or more. However, we tend to use technology to enhance existing material and methods: effectively, we are still using the lecture-tutorial teaching model of last century. We are approaching the third decade of the 21st century, yet research shows that real technology-driven change to teaching methods has been slow to develop. This is for many reasons, including institutional lag in providing access to cutting-edge software and networks. More often cited is educators’ resistance, particularly in light of surveys in which students express dissatisfaction when blended or flipped classroom methods are introduced. I contend that the main reason for this dissatisfaction is about training: not of university staff, but of stu-dents, who we expect to automatically accept major changes to the way most have always been taught and assessed, without adequate explanation. Student training is part of what I see as the move to ‘blended learning 3.0’, in which we reassess what has worked and what has failed, on the way to revolutionising the way educators teach and students learn in 21st-century smart universities.",
keywords = "Blended learning in higher education, Technology in higher education",
author = "Dann, {Caron Elizabeth}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-92363-5",
volume = "99",
series = "Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "214--223",
editor = "V. Uskov and Howlett, {R. J.} and Jain, {L. C. } and L. Vlacic",
booktitle = "Smart Education and e-Learning 2018",
edition = "1",

}

Dann, CE 2019, Blended Learning 3.0: Getting students on board. in V Uskov, RJ Howlett, LC Jain & L Vlacic (eds), Smart Education and e-Learning 2018. 1 edn, vol. 99, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Springer, pp. 214-223.

Blended Learning 3.0: Getting students on board. / Dann, Caron Elizabeth.

Smart Education and e-Learning 2018. ed. / V. Uskov; R. J. Howlett; L. C. Jain; L. Vlacic. Vol. 99 1. ed. Springer, 2019. p. 214-223 (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Blended Learning 3.0: Getting students on board

AU - Dann, Caron Elizabeth

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - It is widely acknowledged that smart technologies offer exciting potential for university teaching and learning. In this brave new world, educators are urged to discard traditional teaching methods, such as the lecture, and re-place them with student-centred modes that incorporate digital technology, self- and peer-based teaching and online content. In the communications and media studies discipline, many educators have been incorporating new technology for 10 years or more. However, we tend to use technology to enhance existing material and methods: effectively, we are still using the lecture-tutorial teaching model of last century. We are approaching the third decade of the 21st century, yet research shows that real technology-driven change to teaching methods has been slow to develop. This is for many reasons, including institutional lag in providing access to cutting-edge software and networks. More often cited is educators’ resistance, particularly in light of surveys in which students express dissatisfaction when blended or flipped classroom methods are introduced. I contend that the main reason for this dissatisfaction is about training: not of university staff, but of stu-dents, who we expect to automatically accept major changes to the way most have always been taught and assessed, without adequate explanation. Student training is part of what I see as the move to ‘blended learning 3.0’, in which we reassess what has worked and what has failed, on the way to revolutionising the way educators teach and students learn in 21st-century smart universities.

AB - It is widely acknowledged that smart technologies offer exciting potential for university teaching and learning. In this brave new world, educators are urged to discard traditional teaching methods, such as the lecture, and re-place them with student-centred modes that incorporate digital technology, self- and peer-based teaching and online content. In the communications and media studies discipline, many educators have been incorporating new technology for 10 years or more. However, we tend to use technology to enhance existing material and methods: effectively, we are still using the lecture-tutorial teaching model of last century. We are approaching the third decade of the 21st century, yet research shows that real technology-driven change to teaching methods has been slow to develop. This is for many reasons, including institutional lag in providing access to cutting-edge software and networks. More often cited is educators’ resistance, particularly in light of surveys in which students express dissatisfaction when blended or flipped classroom methods are introduced. I contend that the main reason for this dissatisfaction is about training: not of university staff, but of stu-dents, who we expect to automatically accept major changes to the way most have always been taught and assessed, without adequate explanation. Student training is part of what I see as the move to ‘blended learning 3.0’, in which we reassess what has worked and what has failed, on the way to revolutionising the way educators teach and students learn in 21st-century smart universities.

KW - Blended learning in higher education

KW - Technology in higher education

UR - https://www.springer.com/gb/book/9783319923628

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 978-3-319-92363-5

VL - 99

T3 - Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies

SP - 214

EP - 223

BT - Smart Education and e-Learning 2018

A2 - Uskov, V.

A2 - Howlett, R. J.

A2 - Jain, L. C.

A2 - Vlacic, L.

PB - Springer

ER -

Dann CE. Blended Learning 3.0: Getting students on board. In Uskov V, Howlett RJ, Jain LC, Vlacic L, editors, Smart Education and e-Learning 2018. 1 ed. Vol. 99. Springer. 2019. p. 214-223. (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies).