TY - JOUR
T1 - Bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition, and change in adiposity, in overweight and obese adolescents
T2 - Comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
AU - Wan, Ching S.
AU - Ward, Leigh C.
AU - Halim, Jocelyn
AU - Gow, Megan L.
AU - Ho, Mandy
AU - Briody, Julie N.
AU - Leung, Kelvin
AU - Cowell, Chris T.
AU - Garnett, Sarah P.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are extremely grateful to all the adolescents and families who took part in this study. The project was funded by an Early Career Research Fellowship, Cancer Institute NSW. RESIST was funded by BUPA Foundation Australia Pty Limited and Heart Foundation, Australia (#G08S3758). The funding bodies had no involvement in the study design, in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; nor in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Wan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
PY - 2014/10/3
Y1 - 2014/10/3
N2 - Background: There is a need for a practical, inexpensive method to assess body composition in obese adolescents. This study aimed to 1) compare body composition parameters estimated by a stand-on, multi-frequency bioelectrical impendence (BIA) device, using a) the manufacturers' equations, and b) published and derived equations with body composition measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and 2) assess percentage body fat (%BF) change after a weight loss intervention.Methods: Participants were 66 obese adolescents, mean age (SD) 12.9 (2.0) years. Body composition was measured by Tanita BIA MC-180MA (Tanita BIA8) and DXA (GE-Lunar Prodigy). BIA resistance and reactance data at frequencies of 5, 50, 250 and 500 kHz, were used in published equations, and to generate a new prediction equation for fat-free mass (FFM) using a split-sample method. Approximately half (n = 34) of the adolescents had their body composition measured by DXA and BIA on two occasions, three to nine months apart.Results: The correlations between FFM (kg), fat mass (kg) and %BF measured by BIA and DXA were 0.92, 0.93 and 0.78, respectively. The Tanita BIA8 manufacturers equations significantly (P < 0.001) overestimated FFM (4.3 kg [-5.3 to 13.9]) and underestimated %BF (-5.0% [-15 to 5.0]) compared to DXA. The mean differences between BIA derived equations and DXA measured body composition parameters were small (0.4 to 2.1%), not significant, but had large limits of agreements (~ ±15% for FFM). After the intervention mean %BF loss was similar by both methods (~1.5%), but with wide limits of agreement.Conclusion: The Tanita BIA8 could be a valuable clinical tool to measure body composition at the group level, but is inaccurate for the individual obese adolescent.
AB - Background: There is a need for a practical, inexpensive method to assess body composition in obese adolescents. This study aimed to 1) compare body composition parameters estimated by a stand-on, multi-frequency bioelectrical impendence (BIA) device, using a) the manufacturers' equations, and b) published and derived equations with body composition measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and 2) assess percentage body fat (%BF) change after a weight loss intervention.Methods: Participants were 66 obese adolescents, mean age (SD) 12.9 (2.0) years. Body composition was measured by Tanita BIA MC-180MA (Tanita BIA8) and DXA (GE-Lunar Prodigy). BIA resistance and reactance data at frequencies of 5, 50, 250 and 500 kHz, were used in published equations, and to generate a new prediction equation for fat-free mass (FFM) using a split-sample method. Approximately half (n = 34) of the adolescents had their body composition measured by DXA and BIA on two occasions, three to nine months apart.Results: The correlations between FFM (kg), fat mass (kg) and %BF measured by BIA and DXA were 0.92, 0.93 and 0.78, respectively. The Tanita BIA8 manufacturers equations significantly (P < 0.001) overestimated FFM (4.3 kg [-5.3 to 13.9]) and underestimated %BF (-5.0% [-15 to 5.0]) compared to DXA. The mean differences between BIA derived equations and DXA measured body composition parameters were small (0.4 to 2.1%), not significant, but had large limits of agreements (~ ±15% for FFM). After the intervention mean %BF loss was similar by both methods (~1.5%), but with wide limits of agreement.Conclusion: The Tanita BIA8 could be a valuable clinical tool to measure body composition at the group level, but is inaccurate for the individual obese adolescent.
KW - Adolescents
KW - Bioelectrical impedance analysis
KW - Cole-Cole plot
KW - Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
KW - Obese
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910075407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2431-14-249
DO - 10.1186/1471-2431-14-249
M3 - Article
C2 - 25280868
AN - SCOPUS:84910075407
SN - 1471-2431
VL - 14
JO - BMC Pediatrics
JF - BMC Pediatrics
IS - 1
M1 - 249
ER -