Abstract
People often fail to achieve health goals, which compromises their well-being. Prior research suggests that seeing events through an observer's eyes (i.e., adopting a third-person perspective) should facilitate goal pursuit. However, we find that third-person perspectives discourage goal-consistent intentions and behavior for health goals when goal centrality is low (i.e., the goal is peripheral to one's self-concept). In Experiment 1, people who adopted a third-person perspective chose more sugary foods if they considered a healthy eating goal to be more peripheral to the self. Experiment 2 examines why a third-person perspective can hinder goal pursuit; it encourages a breakdown in implemental thinking which, in turn, increases negative self-conscious emotions. While high goal centrality buffers people from negative effects on goal intentions, low centrality does not. Experiment 3 demonstrates that this effect is robust when goal centrality is manipulated. We recommend that consumers pursuing health goals (and individuals who support them) exercise caution when employing perspective-based strategies, as they may backfire for people at greatest risk of goal abandonment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 368-378 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Consumer Psychology |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Affect and emotion
- Goals and motivation
- Health psychology
- Self and identity
- Self-regulation and self-control
- Transformative consumer research