Biased agonism at G protein-coupled receptors: The promise and the challenges - A medicinal chemistry perspective

Jeremy Shonberg, Laura Lopez Munoz, Peter John Scammells, Arthur Christopoulos, Benvenuto Capuano, Jonathan Robert David Lane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Historically, determination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligand efficacy has often been restricted to identifying the ligand as an agonist or antagonist at a given signaling pathway. This classification was deemed sufficient to predict compound efficacy at all signaling endpoints, including the therapeutically relevant one(s). However, it is now apparent that ligands acting at the same GPCR can stabilize multiple, distinct, receptor conformations linked to different functional outcomes. This phenomenon, known as biased agonism, stimulus bias, or functional selectivity offers the opportunity to separate on-target therapeutic effects from side effects through the design of drugs that show pathway selectivity. However, the medicinal chemist faces numerous challenges to develop biased ligands, including the detection and quantification of biased agonism. This review summarizes the current state of the field of research into biased agonism at GPCRs, with a particular focus on efforts to relate biased agonism to ligand structure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1286 - 1330
Number of pages45
JournalMedicinal Research Reviews
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{b3c3e5e02d974171af2161d25942ba41,
title = "Biased agonism at G protein-coupled receptors: The promise and the challenges - A medicinal chemistry perspective",
abstract = "Historically, determination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligand efficacy has often been restricted to identifying the ligand as an agonist or antagonist at a given signaling pathway. This classification was deemed sufficient to predict compound efficacy at all signaling endpoints, including the therapeutically relevant one(s). However, it is now apparent that ligands acting at the same GPCR can stabilize multiple, distinct, receptor conformations linked to different functional outcomes. This phenomenon, known as biased agonism, stimulus bias, or functional selectivity offers the opportunity to separate on-target therapeutic effects from side effects through the design of drugs that show pathway selectivity. However, the medicinal chemist faces numerous challenges to develop biased ligands, including the detection and quantification of biased agonism. This review summarizes the current state of the field of research into biased agonism at GPCRs, with a particular focus on efforts to relate biased agonism to ligand structure.",
author = "Jeremy Shonberg and {Lopez Munoz}, Laura and Scammells, {Peter John} and Arthur Christopoulos and Benvenuto Capuano and Lane, {Jonathan Robert David}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/med.21318",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1286 -- 1330",
journal = "Medicinal Research Reviews",
issn = "0198-6325",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Biased agonism at G protein-coupled receptors: The promise and the challenges - A medicinal chemistry perspective. / Shonberg, Jeremy; Lopez Munoz, Laura; Scammells, Peter John; Christopoulos, Arthur; Capuano, Benvenuto; Lane, Jonathan Robert David.

In: Medicinal Research Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2014, p. 1286 - 1330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biased agonism at G protein-coupled receptors: The promise and the challenges - A medicinal chemistry perspective

AU - Shonberg, Jeremy

AU - Lopez Munoz, Laura

AU - Scammells, Peter John

AU - Christopoulos, Arthur

AU - Capuano, Benvenuto

AU - Lane, Jonathan Robert David

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Historically, determination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligand efficacy has often been restricted to identifying the ligand as an agonist or antagonist at a given signaling pathway. This classification was deemed sufficient to predict compound efficacy at all signaling endpoints, including the therapeutically relevant one(s). However, it is now apparent that ligands acting at the same GPCR can stabilize multiple, distinct, receptor conformations linked to different functional outcomes. This phenomenon, known as biased agonism, stimulus bias, or functional selectivity offers the opportunity to separate on-target therapeutic effects from side effects through the design of drugs that show pathway selectivity. However, the medicinal chemist faces numerous challenges to develop biased ligands, including the detection and quantification of biased agonism. This review summarizes the current state of the field of research into biased agonism at GPCRs, with a particular focus on efforts to relate biased agonism to ligand structure.

AB - Historically, determination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligand efficacy has often been restricted to identifying the ligand as an agonist or antagonist at a given signaling pathway. This classification was deemed sufficient to predict compound efficacy at all signaling endpoints, including the therapeutically relevant one(s). However, it is now apparent that ligands acting at the same GPCR can stabilize multiple, distinct, receptor conformations linked to different functional outcomes. This phenomenon, known as biased agonism, stimulus bias, or functional selectivity offers the opportunity to separate on-target therapeutic effects from side effects through the design of drugs that show pathway selectivity. However, the medicinal chemist faces numerous challenges to develop biased ligands, including the detection and quantification of biased agonism. This review summarizes the current state of the field of research into biased agonism at GPCRs, with a particular focus on efforts to relate biased agonism to ligand structure.

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med.21318/epdf

U2 - 10.1002/med.21318

DO - 10.1002/med.21318

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1286

EP - 1330

JO - Medicinal Research Reviews

JF - Medicinal Research Reviews

SN - 0198-6325

IS - 6

ER -