Beyond total area protected: A new set of metrics to measure progress in building a robust protected area estate

Carly N. Cook, Rebecca S. Valkan, Melodie A. McGeoch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

With protected areas identified as the primary tool to halt the loss of biodiversity, the Convention on Biological Diversity has set targets for protected area expansion. Increasingly, concerns are being raised that target-driven growth, where targets focus largely on quantity (total area protected) rather than quality, may fail to achieve their intended biodiversity outcomes. Therefore, it is important to assess whether growth in area protected is translating into a more robust system of protected areas that better safeguard biodiversity. In this study, we propose a set of seven indicators, drawing on the body of evidence for the elements of protected area design and management associated with better biodiversity outcomes. Many of the features of effective design and management interact with one another, making it essential to use a suite of indicators and consider progress relative to trends across all of these indicators. We implemented the proposed indicators for the Australian National Reserve System, which has undergone significant growth over the past two decades. Our findings demonstrate that relying on trends in total area protected can obscure negative trends in other important indicators which suggest many protected areas in Australia are under increasing pressure. Meanwhile, the level of resourcing for management has not kept pace with increases in total area protected and has certainly not scaled with changes in pressures on protected areas. It is important that the global conservation community strive for a more nuanced set of indicators for conservation progress to identify whether growth in area protected has, or has not, translated into a more robust and effective system of protected areas. Given that most of the indicators we propose can be populated with existing data, we believe this approach could be achievable for protected areas globally.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101963
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume58
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Keywords

  • Aichi target 11
  • Biodiversity indicators
  • Convention on Biological Diversity
  • National parks
  • Nature reserves
  • PADDD

Cite this

@article{43ad85566066427c9bae489d6192eaba,
title = "Beyond total area protected: A new set of metrics to measure progress in building a robust protected area estate",
abstract = "With protected areas identified as the primary tool to halt the loss of biodiversity, the Convention on Biological Diversity has set targets for protected area expansion. Increasingly, concerns are being raised that target-driven growth, where targets focus largely on quantity (total area protected) rather than quality, may fail to achieve their intended biodiversity outcomes. Therefore, it is important to assess whether growth in area protected is translating into a more robust system of protected areas that better safeguard biodiversity. In this study, we propose a set of seven indicators, drawing on the body of evidence for the elements of protected area design and management associated with better biodiversity outcomes. Many of the features of effective design and management interact with one another, making it essential to use a suite of indicators and consider progress relative to trends across all of these indicators. We implemented the proposed indicators for the Australian National Reserve System, which has undergone significant growth over the past two decades. Our findings demonstrate that relying on trends in total area protected can obscure negative trends in other important indicators which suggest many protected areas in Australia are under increasing pressure. Meanwhile, the level of resourcing for management has not kept pace with increases in total area protected and has certainly not scaled with changes in pressures on protected areas. It is important that the global conservation community strive for a more nuanced set of indicators for conservation progress to identify whether growth in area protected has, or has not, translated into a more robust and effective system of protected areas. Given that most of the indicators we propose can be populated with existing data, we believe this approach could be achievable for protected areas globally.",
keywords = "Aichi target 11, Biodiversity indicators, Convention on Biological Diversity, National parks, Nature reserves, PADDD",
author = "Cook, {Carly N.} and Valkan, {Rebecca S.} and McGeoch, {Melodie A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101963",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Beyond total area protected : A new set of metrics to measure progress in building a robust protected area estate. / Cook, Carly N.; Valkan, Rebecca S.; McGeoch, Melodie A.

In: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 58, 101963, 01.09.2019, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond total area protected

T2 - A new set of metrics to measure progress in building a robust protected area estate

AU - Cook, Carly N.

AU - Valkan, Rebecca S.

AU - McGeoch, Melodie A.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - With protected areas identified as the primary tool to halt the loss of biodiversity, the Convention on Biological Diversity has set targets for protected area expansion. Increasingly, concerns are being raised that target-driven growth, where targets focus largely on quantity (total area protected) rather than quality, may fail to achieve their intended biodiversity outcomes. Therefore, it is important to assess whether growth in area protected is translating into a more robust system of protected areas that better safeguard biodiversity. In this study, we propose a set of seven indicators, drawing on the body of evidence for the elements of protected area design and management associated with better biodiversity outcomes. Many of the features of effective design and management interact with one another, making it essential to use a suite of indicators and consider progress relative to trends across all of these indicators. We implemented the proposed indicators for the Australian National Reserve System, which has undergone significant growth over the past two decades. Our findings demonstrate that relying on trends in total area protected can obscure negative trends in other important indicators which suggest many protected areas in Australia are under increasing pressure. Meanwhile, the level of resourcing for management has not kept pace with increases in total area protected and has certainly not scaled with changes in pressures on protected areas. It is important that the global conservation community strive for a more nuanced set of indicators for conservation progress to identify whether growth in area protected has, or has not, translated into a more robust and effective system of protected areas. Given that most of the indicators we propose can be populated with existing data, we believe this approach could be achievable for protected areas globally.

AB - With protected areas identified as the primary tool to halt the loss of biodiversity, the Convention on Biological Diversity has set targets for protected area expansion. Increasingly, concerns are being raised that target-driven growth, where targets focus largely on quantity (total area protected) rather than quality, may fail to achieve their intended biodiversity outcomes. Therefore, it is important to assess whether growth in area protected is translating into a more robust system of protected areas that better safeguard biodiversity. In this study, we propose a set of seven indicators, drawing on the body of evidence for the elements of protected area design and management associated with better biodiversity outcomes. Many of the features of effective design and management interact with one another, making it essential to use a suite of indicators and consider progress relative to trends across all of these indicators. We implemented the proposed indicators for the Australian National Reserve System, which has undergone significant growth over the past two decades. Our findings demonstrate that relying on trends in total area protected can obscure negative trends in other important indicators which suggest many protected areas in Australia are under increasing pressure. Meanwhile, the level of resourcing for management has not kept pace with increases in total area protected and has certainly not scaled with changes in pressures on protected areas. It is important that the global conservation community strive for a more nuanced set of indicators for conservation progress to identify whether growth in area protected has, or has not, translated into a more robust and effective system of protected areas. Given that most of the indicators we propose can be populated with existing data, we believe this approach could be achievable for protected areas globally.

KW - Aichi target 11

KW - Biodiversity indicators

KW - Convention on Biological Diversity

KW - National parks

KW - Nature reserves

KW - PADDD

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071132369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101963

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101963

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071132369

VL - 58

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

M1 - 101963

ER -