TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond the challenge to research integrity
T2 - imposter participation in incentivised qualitative research and its impact on community engagement
AU - Drysdale, Kerryn
AU - Wells, Nathanael
AU - Smith, Anthony K.J.
AU - Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
AU - Sturgiss, Elizabeth Ann
AU - Wark, Tim
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Participant recruitment for qualitative research often offers incentives (honoraria; financial compensation) to increase participation and to recognise lived expertise and time involved in research. While not necessarily a new concern for survey and other quantitative based research, ‘spam', ‘bot', and other inauthentic forms of research participation has rarely been an apparent issue for qualitative research, given it often involves levels of interaction with potential participants prior to the conduct of in-depth interviews and other methods of data generation. This is no longer the case. A troubling new occurrence has meant that recruitment calls for qualitative research with incentives on public-facing social media have attracted ‘imposter’ expressions of interest and research participation. In this commentary, we explore this challenge that goes beyond research integrity. In particular, we consider the risks of employing strategies to screen for legitimate participants and the importance of building trust and maintaining community engagement.
AB - Participant recruitment for qualitative research often offers incentives (honoraria; financial compensation) to increase participation and to recognise lived expertise and time involved in research. While not necessarily a new concern for survey and other quantitative based research, ‘spam', ‘bot', and other inauthentic forms of research participation has rarely been an apparent issue for qualitative research, given it often involves levels of interaction with potential participants prior to the conduct of in-depth interviews and other methods of data generation. This is no longer the case. A troubling new occurrence has meant that recruitment calls for qualitative research with incentives on public-facing social media have attracted ‘imposter’ expressions of interest and research participation. In this commentary, we explore this challenge that goes beyond research integrity. In particular, we consider the risks of employing strategies to screen for legitimate participants and the importance of building trust and maintaining community engagement.
KW - community engagement
KW - imposter participants
KW - incentivised research
KW - marginalised communities
KW - Qualitative research
KW - research integrity
KW - trust
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173548860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14461242.2023.2261433
DO - 10.1080/14461242.2023.2261433
M3 - Article
C2 - 37786312
AN - SCOPUS:85173548860
SN - 1446-1242
VL - 32
SP - 372
EP - 380
JO - Health Sociology Review
JF - Health Sociology Review
IS - 3
ER -