Beyond expectations

The effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction

Remi Trudel, Kyle B. Murray, June Cotte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction. In contrast to the disconfirmation of expectations model of satisfaction, we find that, although regulatory focus does affect consumers' expectations, the effect on satisfaction cannot be explained by differences in those expectations. Instead, our results reveal a direct effect of consumers' regulatory focus on satisfaction that is based on the conservative bias of prevention-focused consumers. Compared to promotion-focused consumers, prevention-focused consumers protect against making errors and demonstrate a conservative bias in their evaluations of satisfaction. The results of two experiments demonstrate this conservative bias, showing that, compared to promotion-focused consumers, prevention-focused consumers are less satisfied with positive outcomes and more satisfied with negative outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-97
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Research in Marketing
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Expectations
  • Promotion and prevention
  • Regulatory focus
  • Satisfaction

Cite this

@article{b02ffb13349f492b9ef616bbb341b60a,
title = "Beyond expectations: The effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction",
abstract = "This paper examines the effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction. In contrast to the disconfirmation of expectations model of satisfaction, we find that, although regulatory focus does affect consumers' expectations, the effect on satisfaction cannot be explained by differences in those expectations. Instead, our results reveal a direct effect of consumers' regulatory focus on satisfaction that is based on the conservative bias of prevention-focused consumers. Compared to promotion-focused consumers, prevention-focused consumers protect against making errors and demonstrate a conservative bias in their evaluations of satisfaction. The results of two experiments demonstrate this conservative bias, showing that, compared to promotion-focused consumers, prevention-focused consumers are less satisfied with positive outcomes and more satisfied with negative outcomes.",
keywords = "Expectations, Promotion and prevention, Regulatory focus, Satisfaction",
author = "Remi Trudel and Murray, {Kyle B.} and June Cotte",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "93--97",
journal = "International Journal of Research in Marketing",
issn = "0167-8116",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Beyond expectations : The effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction. / Trudel, Remi; Murray, Kyle B.; Cotte, June.

In: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 29, No. 1, 03.2012, p. 93-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond expectations

T2 - The effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction

AU - Trudel, Remi

AU - Murray, Kyle B.

AU - Cotte, June

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - This paper examines the effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction. In contrast to the disconfirmation of expectations model of satisfaction, we find that, although regulatory focus does affect consumers' expectations, the effect on satisfaction cannot be explained by differences in those expectations. Instead, our results reveal a direct effect of consumers' regulatory focus on satisfaction that is based on the conservative bias of prevention-focused consumers. Compared to promotion-focused consumers, prevention-focused consumers protect against making errors and demonstrate a conservative bias in their evaluations of satisfaction. The results of two experiments demonstrate this conservative bias, showing that, compared to promotion-focused consumers, prevention-focused consumers are less satisfied with positive outcomes and more satisfied with negative outcomes.

AB - This paper examines the effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction. In contrast to the disconfirmation of expectations model of satisfaction, we find that, although regulatory focus does affect consumers' expectations, the effect on satisfaction cannot be explained by differences in those expectations. Instead, our results reveal a direct effect of consumers' regulatory focus on satisfaction that is based on the conservative bias of prevention-focused consumers. Compared to promotion-focused consumers, prevention-focused consumers protect against making errors and demonstrate a conservative bias in their evaluations of satisfaction. The results of two experiments demonstrate this conservative bias, showing that, compared to promotion-focused consumers, prevention-focused consumers are less satisfied with positive outcomes and more satisfied with negative outcomes.

KW - Expectations

KW - Promotion and prevention

KW - Regulatory focus

KW - Satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858794387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.10.001

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 93

EP - 97

JO - International Journal of Research in Marketing

JF - International Journal of Research in Marketing

SN - 0167-8116

IS - 1

ER -