Beyond authenticity? Humanism, posthumanism and new organization development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In recent debates, the relevance of traditional objectivist organization development (OD) approaches has been questioned in terms of their appropriateness for contemporary organizations. A new OD has emerged wherein change is viewed as a socially constructed process and where there are multiple rather than singular authentic possibilities. We explore these possibilities by drawing on employees discussions of how they manage conflicting interpretations of organizational change. Using the example of emotional labour, we compare traditional and new OD approaches in terms of how they view authenticity and then discuss posthumanist analysis, in which authenticity (or lack thereof) is no longer of focal concern. In particular, under traditional OD, where authenticity can be discovered , the need to negotiate multiplicity and to downplay negative responses is a problem to be addressed. Under new OD such multiplicity becomes data for dialogue and discussion of future potentials. In contrast, a posthumanist analysis, while relational, neither reframes nor tempers authenticity but decentres the very notion of autonomy on which authenticity is based. The social constructionism of new OD is recast and implications for theory and intervention are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)706 - 723
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{db536a04e1e744039b1a799998c6812e,
title = "Beyond authenticity? Humanism, posthumanism and new organization development",
abstract = "In recent debates, the relevance of traditional objectivist organization development (OD) approaches has been questioned in terms of their appropriateness for contemporary organizations. A new OD has emerged wherein change is viewed as a socially constructed process and where there are multiple rather than singular authentic possibilities. We explore these possibilities by drawing on employees discussions of how they manage conflicting interpretations of organizational change. Using the example of emotional labour, we compare traditional and new OD approaches in terms of how they view authenticity and then discuss posthumanist analysis, in which authenticity (or lack thereof) is no longer of focal concern. In particular, under traditional OD, where authenticity can be discovered , the need to negotiate multiplicity and to downplay negative responses is a problem to be addressed. Under new OD such multiplicity becomes data for dialogue and discussion of future potentials. In contrast, a posthumanist analysis, while relational, neither reframes nor tempers authenticity but decentres the very notion of autonomy on which authenticity is based. The social constructionism of new OD is recast and implications for theory and intervention are discussed.",
author = "Melanie Bryant and {Wolfram Cox}, {Julie Rosalind}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8551.12005",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "706 -- 723",
journal = "British Journal of Management",
issn = "1045-3172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Beyond authenticity? Humanism, posthumanism and new organization development. / Bryant, Melanie; Wolfram Cox, Julie Rosalind.

In: British Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2014, p. 706 - 723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond authenticity? Humanism, posthumanism and new organization development

AU - Bryant, Melanie

AU - Wolfram Cox, Julie Rosalind

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In recent debates, the relevance of traditional objectivist organization development (OD) approaches has been questioned in terms of their appropriateness for contemporary organizations. A new OD has emerged wherein change is viewed as a socially constructed process and where there are multiple rather than singular authentic possibilities. We explore these possibilities by drawing on employees discussions of how they manage conflicting interpretations of organizational change. Using the example of emotional labour, we compare traditional and new OD approaches in terms of how they view authenticity and then discuss posthumanist analysis, in which authenticity (or lack thereof) is no longer of focal concern. In particular, under traditional OD, where authenticity can be discovered , the need to negotiate multiplicity and to downplay negative responses is a problem to be addressed. Under new OD such multiplicity becomes data for dialogue and discussion of future potentials. In contrast, a posthumanist analysis, while relational, neither reframes nor tempers authenticity but decentres the very notion of autonomy on which authenticity is based. The social constructionism of new OD is recast and implications for theory and intervention are discussed.

AB - In recent debates, the relevance of traditional objectivist organization development (OD) approaches has been questioned in terms of their appropriateness for contemporary organizations. A new OD has emerged wherein change is viewed as a socially constructed process and where there are multiple rather than singular authentic possibilities. We explore these possibilities by drawing on employees discussions of how they manage conflicting interpretations of organizational change. Using the example of emotional labour, we compare traditional and new OD approaches in terms of how they view authenticity and then discuss posthumanist analysis, in which authenticity (or lack thereof) is no longer of focal concern. In particular, under traditional OD, where authenticity can be discovered , the need to negotiate multiplicity and to downplay negative responses is a problem to be addressed. Under new OD such multiplicity becomes data for dialogue and discussion of future potentials. In contrast, a posthumanist analysis, while relational, neither reframes nor tempers authenticity but decentres the very notion of autonomy on which authenticity is based. The social constructionism of new OD is recast and implications for theory and intervention are discussed.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12005

DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12005

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 706

EP - 723

JO - British Journal of Management

JF - British Journal of Management

SN - 1045-3172

IS - 4

ER -